Advanced

Does SCO Matter?

Posted by AnonymousCoward on · Post a comment
eWeek; By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Mail this story
Print this story

What have all of SCO's legal actions amounted to? In many ways, not much, but in others, SCO has profoundly changed how we think about technology. [and Steve explores this theme]

When it all started, back in March 2003, there was a lot of talk about how SCO's attack on Linux might cripple Linux's growth.

It hasn't happened. [...]

SCO's stock sits near an all-time low of $2.85. It's actually worse than that. Far too many people seem to have forgotten that before SCO launched its lawsuit against IBM, the company had a 4-to-1 reverse stock split in 2002. Therefore, by pre-reverse stock split measures, SCO has sunk to a smidgen over 70 cents a share. [...]

While it's highly unlikely that SCO can win its cases against IBM and Novell, its actions have led to IP issues becoming just as important as ROI (return on investment) and TCO (total cost of ownership).

[and in much more detail Steve laments the damage done by The SCO Group to the industry's level of legal trust]

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Community, SCO

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post