Should I run my desktop 24/7?
|
|
|
Comments (3)
FWIW: In 2002 I was running Folding@Home on my desktop system, a 2GHz x86 (I think it was AMD, but I don't remember for sure). I decided to do an experiment, for giggles: during a summer month when the central heat wasn't running, I ran F@H, and the following month didn't run it.
I found that F@H added roughly $10 to the electric bill, confirmed the following month when I resumed running F@H. That was a price I was willing to contribute to the work of F@H.
I found that F@H added roughly $10 to the electric bill, confirmed the following month when I resumed running F@H. That was a price I was willing to contribute to the work of F@H.
@gus3 The same for me. Since the virus thing struck, have been running BOINC traffic continuously on the home desktop and one in the garage that I use for other things.
If the machine is doing useful work, then it's not a waste to have it on. I would imagine that a reasonably efficient PC setup doing substantial work would be drawing about the same as a fridge/freezer.
If the machine is doing useful work, then it's not a waste to have it on. I would imagine that a reasonably efficient PC setup doing substantial work would be drawing about the same as a fridge/freezer.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

[That Redhat blog spot does not have a user comments sub-section.]