Advanced

Cagw Criticizes Open Source Mandate in Massachusetts

Posted by tadelste on · 9 comments
PR Newswire (press release)
Mail this story
Print this story

Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today criticized a plan in Massachusetts to force all state computer networks to move to an open source format.

WASHINGTON, Sept. 21 /PRNewswire/ -- Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today criticized a plan in Massachusetts to force all state computer networks to move to an open source format. The Massachusetts Information Technology Division is proposing the Enterprise Information Technology Architecture technology policy, which would mandate that state agencies use only open source and open standard software by January 1, 2007. "It is bad procurement policy for any state to unilaterally lock itself into one set of technologies," CAGW President Tom Schatz said. "Agencies should be able to accept bids from any company that can provide the desired product or service. Government earns the best value for taxpayer dollars through a competitive, transparent, and accountable bidding process." The policy of standardizing OpenDocument Format for state agencies is aimed at avoiding the patents and licensing of proprietary software like Word Perfect, Lotus Notes and Microsoft Office. However, the switch could incur additional costs: Converting more than one million current files to the open source format; teaching and training a new technical support staff to provide state workers with assistance on the new systems; and re-training the entire state's workforce to use the new software. Furthermore, private sector businesses and average citizens could face compatibility problems in exchanging documents with the state agencies. "The proposed shift in software will be paid for by the taxpayers, businesses, and regular citizens of Massachusetts," Schatz continued. In July, 2004 the Office of Management and Budget stated that the federal government should keep its options open and assess the total cost of ownership when determining the best software to use. An objective look at the merits of software considers maintenance, functionality, performance, and security -- factors not always considered in procurement decisions based solely on a licensing or development model. "By rushing to establish an arbitrary preference for open source, Massachusetts is undermining free market competition and driving up costs. This will limit choice and access to whatever proprietary technologies may emerge in the coming years and could adversely affect the day-to-day operations of Massachusetts state government. Gov. Romney should take steps to keep the state from making the wrong decision about the future of its use of technology," Schatz added.

Citizens Against Government Waste is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in government.



SOURCE Citizens Against Government Waste Web Site: http://www.cagw.org

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Press Release

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (9)

CAGW

sbergman27: Your reference is important. But, the stats say people on this site don't like to click on links. Under the Fair Use Clause, I'd like to point out a couple of paragraphs:

Microsoft Supported by Dead People By Thor Olavsrud Apparently the dead are fed up with the government's antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. According to a report in the Los Angeles Times Thursday morning, letters purportedly written by at least two dead people have made their way onto the desk of Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff. The letters asked Shurtleff to go easy on the company.

According to the article, the letters, along with those of 400 Utah citizens, are part of a nationwide "grassroots" campaign orchestrated by pro-Microsoft groups Americans for Technology Leadership (ATL) and Citizens Against Government Waste. The groups receive some funding from Microsoft but won't disclose how much.
Good point. Gotta love it, though. Letters from concerned citizens who are six feet under certainly puts a new spin on the term "grass roots" campaign.
I put your link on the front page, BTW. 8-)
Tom, Steve:

I am shocked, SHOCKED, that you would cast such aspersions on the free and democratic participation of deceased Americans in the civic affairs that so many of us talk about, but so often ignore.

Why, here in Chicagoland, I don't think we could so much as conduct an election for dog-catcher with the participation of our dead fellow citizens.

Shame on you both.
Oops...

That is, we couldn't conduct an election WITHOUT our dead friends.
If the shoe fits, wear it.
Apparently CAGW have their own chat group on the undernet irc servers but i wouldn't bother with it, its usually pretty dead in there :)

Do it NOW

It is the right move to convert to an open format, it has to be done sooner or later, and later will cost a lot more and there will be more to convert.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post