Advanced

Microsoft vs. Computer Security

Posted by Abe on · 4 comments
Slate; By Adam L. Penenberg
Mail this story
Print this story

Four years ago, Bill Gates dispatched a companywide e-mail promising that security and privacy would be Microsoft's top priorities. Gates urged that new design approaches must "dramatically reduce" the number of security-related issues as well as make fixes easier to administer. "Eventually," he added, "our software should be so fundamentally secure that customers never even worry about it."

Microsoft customers haven't stopped worrying.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

Why should Microsoft fix this problem?

People keep paying good money for Microsoft OS's, so why should Microsoft lower their profit margins by investing in better code? I'm not talking about fixing being 'the right thing to do', or a 'nice thing to do'. I'm just asking why a corporation should lower its own profit margins when the stuff they sell keeps selling at the extremely high markup prices, even though it doesn't work.

Now if their sales start dropping, they might have to fix things, but first they should try a little razzle dazle and see if saying they are serious about security works. After all talk is cheap. A corporation should definitely invest a few measly dollars in a ad campaign before actually trying to fix things.

They can knock the competition too in these ad campaigns. Can't hurt to sling a little mud, and it beats the heck out of actually having to fix your own problems.

Then if the talk doesn't work, actually see the absolute minimum they will have to spend to make the product good enough. Of course they should claim it is the best, but they better not waste the stockholder's profits making it the best, just spend enough to keep customers relatively satisfied.

Who was it who said 'crap is king?', they weren't kidding. As long as market demand for sub-standard software allows MS to make huge profits, they will continue to peddle the same junk they always have.
Do you remember the Ford Pinto gas tank fires? Someone did a movie about it and represented that the carmaker knew about the problem. The cost of a recall was higher than the settlement costs estimated by the actuaries. So, the actuaries won.

As I recall, the problem occurred when the person made a right turn and accidently signed left turn while someone ran into the rear end of the car.

So, that was the bottom line. It was cheaper to settle law suits than have a recall.

Moral, ethical?

I don't do Ford.
Who was it who said 'crap is king?'

That would be Don Henley.
I think it was Mike Myers that said on SNL that "If it ain't Scottish its crap" will that do :)

Legal Disclaimer: I am Scottish :)

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post