Ready to be published? LXer is read by around 350,000 individuals each month, and is an excellent place for you to publish your ideas, thoughts, reviews, complaints, etc. Do you have something to say to the Linux community?
When Richard Stallman created the Free Software Foundation (FSF) in 1985, it was organised around a radical idea: software should be free, not just as in free of charge, but free as in the concept of liberty. During the next 20 years, this idea turned out to be not just radical, but surprisingly practical. Beginning with Stallman’s Emacs text editor, to the various Gnu utilities, the Linux kernel, and beyond, free software has proved to be an enduring success.
[Note to McAllister: The price of subjection is cheap, but its cost is huge. - dcparris]
"Therefore, there’s all the more reason to be disappointed by the FSF’s recent and regrettable spiral into misplaced neopolitical activism. In particular, its moralistic opposition to DRM (digital rights management) technologies, which first manifested itself in early drafts of Version 3 of the GPL (Gnu General Public Licence), now seems to have been an evangelical dogma."
Digital Restrictions Mania is a direct assault on fair use rights ("fair dealing", in the UK, IIUC). It is used to usurp more power over the users of software than any law grants. If GPLv3 did not address the issue of the use of GPL software for DRM, the freedoms the GPL is intended to protect would be subject to the whims of the DRM instigators. This would render the GPL useless.
P.S.: I think dcparris meant "subjugation" instead of "subjection" in his editorial comment in the story lead, but I may be wrong.
So what if consumers will gladly let businesses rob them of their freedoms? DRM is a slippery slope, which indeed leads from Managing the Digital Rights of Producers to Restricting the Digital Rights of Consumers/Hackers.
Region coding on DVDs is a perfect example of the sort of insanity we are headed for in a DRM world.
DRM+DMCA = Death to Homebrew
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
"Therefore, there’s all the more reason to be disappointed by the FSF’s recent and regrettable spiral into misplaced neopolitical activism. In particular, its moralistic opposition to DRM (digital rights management) technologies, which first manifested itself in early drafts of Version 3 of the GPL (Gnu General Public Licence), now seems to have been an evangelical dogma."
Digital Restrictions Mania is a direct assault on fair use rights ("fair dealing", in the UK, IIUC). It is used to usurp more power over the users of software than any law grants. If GPLv3 did not address the issue of the use of GPL software for DRM, the freedoms the GPL is intended to protect would be subject to the whims of the DRM instigators. This would render the GPL useless.
P.S.: I think dcparris meant "subjugation" instead of "subjection" in his editorial comment in the story lead, but I may be wrong.