Advanced

Is Updike Obsolete?

Posted by grouch on · 5 comments
Silicon Valley's Metro; By Annalee Newitz
Mail this story
Print this story

In a recent New York Times Book Review screed, the proverbial old-white-male author John Updike offers a Reader's Digest version of the argument against online publishing. For those of us who are genuinely puzzled by the animosity directed against efforts to digitize books (like Google Print or the Internet Archive's Open Library Project), Updike's short essay is quite instructive.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Community

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

Comments (5)

Ok, the technology has changed, but, the craft and art of writing has not. Updike likes the old way of doing things, and that's fine, but to say that that the technology has diminished the craft, is like saying that visual art produced with the aid of technology is inferior to that which was produced before... In a word 'hogwash'. It's just different.

The other, and perhaps more important, issue with this article is that I kinda expected 'Updike's short essay' rather than Ms Newitz's inane attempt at a 'review'... I Might have been more convinced by the original.

metro active indeed...
grouch Story submitter ·
jimf:

I actually had you in mind when I posted that article. :)

(It doesn't have much to do with FOSS, other than attitude).
> I actually had you in mind when I posted that article. :)

Ouch... already he knows how to yank my chain.
grouch Story submitter ·
I wasn't trying to yank yer chain. It's just that I know you create art using techno-tools and this guy seems to want to turn back the clock a century or so.

The article is probably more directly related to helios and devnet with their blogs. Updike would have us wait for the tale of Alice and the Jolly Roger to appear under the logo of some established publisher, in the quiet stacks of some quaint little bookstore. That would not improve the story one bit. The barbs on devnet's jabs at Ubuntu would be no sharper if his writing appeared under the banner of a printed newspaper, instead of being where there can be instant interaction between author and readers.
> I wasn't trying to yank yer chain

I know... just kidding you :).

> no sharper if his writing appeared under the banner of a printed newspaper, instead of being where there can be instant interaction between author and readers.

Absolutely. In that case the 'only' real difference is the response speed. Yellow Journalism is a long standing American tradition, as is the public's response to it.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post