Advanced

Unwise Hollywood laws hurting U.S. industry

Posted by BarryMead on · 13 comments
NSA encryption design engineer Barry Mead; By Barry Mead
Mail this story
Print this story

The world plainly needs UNCRIPPLED TV's, VCR's, DVR's, COMPUTERS, CELL PHONES, and AUDIO/VIDEO players. Hollywood has been using its huge WAR CHEST to influence unwise legislation preventing U.S. companies from creating these needed products. If the U.S. cannot create them, then other countries will soon DOMINATE

The world plainly needs UNCRIPPLED TV's, VCR's, DVR's, COMPUTERS, CELL PHONES, and AUDIO/VIDEO players. Hollywood has been using its huge WAR CHEST to influence unwise legislation preventing U.S. companies from creating these needed products. If the U.S. cannot create them, then other countries will soon DOMINATE the prized, and strategic High-Tech computer, audio/video, and telecommunications electronics industries. There are also military and national security implications to this negative outcome.

Once we lose these prized markets, we may never be able to regain them. Not only because the leaders in these industries have enormous trend-setting powers, and patent profit advantages, but also because other countries play by different rules than we do. They do not share their technology as eagerly as we do. This is because we export many of our manufacturing and assembly jobs to other countries, who use our wage disparity to gain technology access. If we want our High-Tech products assembled in China, then we have to share our technology with them. But the reverse is NOT true. Once other countries take-the-lead, the sharing stops. They have already taken over hundreds of High-Tech industries, including those that make most cell phones, cameras, radios, computer Motherboards, memory modules, and other computer support chips. We have no hope of bringing these technologies back under U.S. control. We still have a small lead in many technology industries, but that will soon change, if Hollywood has it's way.

The Music Industry, Hollywood, and Microsoft want to believe that if you have a large enough WAR CHEST you can actually cause Congress to hold back the hands-of-time! History wisely taught us that the manufacturers of BUGGY WHIPS took a real beating, (pun intended) when the automobile was invented. Congress didn't, and shouldn't have created laws to impede the progress of automobile manufacturing. Instead, the leather works companies that had been making buggy whips, began to retool, and adapted to make leather upholstery for the newly popular automobiles, which made them even more money than before. Those companies who failed to adapt soon found themselves out-of-touch with the evolving marketplace and suffered financially.

The Music Industry, and Hollywood are acting like spoiled little children. They are whining and begging Congress to halt the wheels-of-progress so they will not have to adapt to the evolving markets. They have also enlisted the help of Microsoft to design an elaborate, complex, and impractical software system named Vista, to CRIPPLE the personal computers that they so desperately fear. If they would embrace technology, and stop clinging hopelessly to their outdated marketing strategies, they would soon realize that there is plenty of money to be made WITHOUT CRIPPLING new technology. Hollywood needn't fear the future, because adapted marketing strategies will automatically define themselves!

All technology devices are converging into broadband Internet connected gadgets that will access their media "On-Demand". It is foolish to worry about the SAVING, or SHARING of media, since soon it will be so widely available that it will seem unthinkable to save your own copy, when you can instantly access it again On-Demand any time you like. You will have such a huge selection of widely diverse On-Demand media to choose from, that individual collections will seem unwieldy, and tiresome to create or maintain.

All broadband customers already pay their service providers a monthly fee, so all that remains is for industry to see that a PIECE of that access fee is apportioned to the proper Copyright Holder linearly proportional to the bandwidth-time used to convey that “On-Demand Copyrighted Work”. With this simple, elegant, system in-place, the self adjusting price rules of supply and demand are maintained, everyone is happy, and everyone makes money. All parties concerned, are proportionately compensated according to the popularity and success of their contributions to the new entertainment industry.

It is obvious, and inevitable, that this solution to the media and copyright controversy will ultimately prevail. The Music Industry, Hollywood, and Congress will eventually be forced to see the wisdom of this elegant solution. It is the only way that the free market economy will be allowed to thrive, and it will ensure that no-one is motivated to fear or retard the development of new ideas or technologies. I have given this issue considerable thought, and I have come to the inescapable conclusion that the problem with Hollywood, Microsoft, and the Music Industry is that they believe they can actually force the world to continue buying and selling BUGGY WHIPS.

Congress has already passed the horrific DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) which violates countless judicially established policies and fair-use principles that have been RESPECTED for GENERATIONS. The DMCA law is already being widely abused to punish innovators and developers of new technology across the land. Their are hundreds of cases where the DMCA has been abused to harass and unfairly persecute innocent innovators. This law is way too strong, in its language, and far to easy to use as a persecution tool. It's abusers unjustly wield this law in a “Guilty-'Til-Proven- Innocent” fashion to freeze-up High-Tech businesses, often until they go bankrupt. Many High-Tech companies have been forced to move overseas to avoid frivolous persecution by this unreasonable, short-sighted law. If the DMCA is not revised to pull some of its teeth, or if new laws being demanded by Hollywood are added, then eventually ALL High-Tech commerce will be driven out of our HOSTILE U.S. environment, and into the hands of our foreign competitors.

More than 90 percent of the people in the United States are HONEST law abiding citizens, who would never dream of abusing technology to illegally propagate copyrighted material. Those dishonest citizens who would already break the existing laws will obviously break any additional laws that are passed, so MORE LAWS are not going to help anyone. These facts, combined with the knowledge that soon all media will be streamed On-Demand where its royalties are paid automatically, make these punitive short-sighted laws requested by Hollywood and the Music Industry seem foolish at best, and quite possibly dangerous to our future well-being and national security.

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial, News Story, Press Release; Groups: Community, LXer, Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (13)

>If the U.S. cannot create them, then other countries will soon DOMINATE

**pulls out soapbox**

This is so true of so many things. This empire is starting to decay from the inside out. We no longer innovate, we no longer inspire, we no longer pursue lofty ideals, and as manufacturing continues to goes overseas, we no longer produce goods in the volumes that we once did. What we do is drop bombs that each cost enough to feed the population of many third world countries for a year.

Hopefully we can turn it around. If not, it's going to be a long downhill drive. Empires don't crumble overnight, and they don't go down quietly.

**puts soapbox away**
I don't agree fully. From the article:

Quoting:It is foolish to worry about the SAVING, or SHARING of media, since soon it will be so widely available that it will seem unthinkable to save your own copy, when you can instantly access it again On-Demand any time you like.


Only if on-demand is free. If not, then everyone will just keep on saving and ripping so they can move anything between machines themselves. Hell, they'll probably download stuff once from the commecial on-demand service and then upload them to their personal on-demand service connected to all their machines. There's still the saving & ripping stage in between.
> instantly access

Yep, 'Pay per view' is in your future.
Only if on-demand is free

If you read my article you will see that from the perspective of the "Broadband User" On-Demand IS free.

Just as your individual TV shows are free when you buy cable television. You pay a monthly broadband access fee and everything after that IS absolutley free and you can access any peice of media you like as many times as you like. This service has Obvious intrinsic VALUE, and customers will be willing to pay a reasonable fee (About as much as their current High-Speed internet fees, and Cable TV fees combined) to have access to these great media collections. Automatically, and completely unknown to the broadband consumer, money is paid to the individual Copyright Holders as the media selections get accessed.
The best way to think of this is a "MONTHLY CABLE TV" fee that you pay, but instead of watching only the shows/songs/pictures whatever that they choose to broadcast, you get to select which shows you want to watch for yourself.

Instead of being paid for by the "COMMERCIALS" the copyright holders get thier money automatically from the broadband service provider based on how much "BANDWIDTH-TIME" is used handling their products.

Initially Hollywood will think this is not such a great deal, but eventually they will realize that they can actually make more money than they ever did before.

This is because they currently make NO MONEY with songs/shows that are broadcast on TV or Radio stations. (They only get the money from the advertisers, or a small one-time use fee paid by some TV stations. Radio stations pay NOTHING when they play songs on the radio)

With this system the cash register rings every time the Work is touched, by everyone that touches it, and the profits are automatically collected by the Content Service Providers. The profits to Copyright Holders will multiply Geometrically.

Hollywood has been worried about copying for NO-REASON at all.
There's a great article about that on El Reg. For a mere $10 per person a *year* the RIAA would make more money than they ever did and people would be able to download, copy and share anyting as much as they like. They tried to implement it in France but the bill didn't pass because big media was against it. They want micropayments, not a flat rate.
This system has everything that everyone wants!

From the "Copyright Holders" point of view it is a "PAY PER VIEW" system. From the "Broadband Users" point of view it is a "Totally Free View Anything You Want System"

Everyone is happier, everyone makes more money, Content choice is unlimited. Fears of "ILLEGAL COPYING" are completely eliminated.

No one has any reason to hold back new ideas or new technology.
BarryMead -

ALMOST everything that everyone wants.

It amounts to a tax on broadband users for the benefit of Hollywood, etc. People who don't use the content will subsidize people who do.

Is that a terrible thing?

It bothers me, but not enough to jump up and down. In my view, the net tradeoff preserves my freedom more than the forced allocation of my funds depletes it, depending, of course, on the ever-present fine print.

However, such a scheme would need a public airing out, and we sould need to understand the role of copyright holders in setting the tax rate.
dino, you far too civilized. Everyone knows the barbarian solution is the optimal choice- fling all the execs of the MAFIAA into the tar pits, and broadcast the event as a warning to wannabe MAFIAA leaders.
tc -

I like your approach better.

Tell me...would we light the tar pits on fire first?
Hey, there's a fundraising opportunity. Sell matches at a dollar each and use the money to buy off some congresscritters to restore a bit of sanity to copyright laws. I wonder how much overturning the DMCA would cost?
8 figures minium, perhaps even 9. That's a *lot* of matches.
>8 figures minium, perhaps even 9. That's a *lot* of matches.

I'll buy 10.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post