Advanced

A Quick Look at Mono Licensing and Microsoft Licensing

Posted by schestowitz on · 2 comments
BoycottNovell; By Roy Schestowitz 		Mail this story
Print this story

When .NET went Shared Source Miguel de Icaza talked about what it all meant. Looking at the Microsoft Reference License you find some very brow-raising phrases discussing software patents.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: GNOME, Microsoft, Novell

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (2)

azerthoth ·
Unfortunatly the license page linked to by the author shoots the conspiracy theory in the foot. From the page the author himself (Roy) Linked to:
Quoting: The .NET Framework is divided in two parts: the ECMA/ISO covered technologies and the other technologies developed on top of it like ADO.NET, ASP.NET and Windows.Forms.

Mono implements the ECMA/ISO covered parts, as well as being a project that aims to implement the higher level blocks like ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms.


Once again you prove that anything sounds good with hyperlinks and the assumption that people will not individually research the issue and notice how slipshod your research actually is. Your starting to make Enderle look like the paragon of competence.
tracyanne ·
These Beatup Novell wankers really are pretty cruddy, I'm begining to think they are, in fact sponsored by Microsoft with the purpose of making Free Software advocate appear dimwitted crackpots.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post