Oct 08, 2004
12:25 PM EDT
|Are there better details of the hardware and software involved? The text only mentions "gentooo/linux 220.127.116.11, XP" and the CPU type.|
Oct 08, 2004
1:25 PM EDT
|A couple other issues:
The video driver versions are different. 66 is supposed to be a reasonable amount faster than 61. Maybe not enough to account for the whole framerate difference, but still...
What services were running on the linux box? I run lots of services in the background and game performance really increases if I stop them.
I would expect Linux to have better performance in doom3, if only because the system requirements are lower. I would expect that id has lots of internal benchmarks, and they would have based the sysreqs on those.
Oct 10, 2004
5:52 AM EDT
|I think such attempts are valid.
And am surprised and somewhat happy noone flamed here.
It is important to see why then - Windows XP is winning in this case. I got a few stolen theories :)
* Sometimes the code is optimized more towards the Windows platform * Sometimes the driver itself is optimized more towards Windows * The latest driver 6111 is not the best/fastest * Gentoo could have been tweaked wrongly - try benchmark with other distros.
So perhaps you want to analize this article and benchmark results:
The study involves more than one benchmark and other applications. Which I think is fairer and more constructive too.
"Oh Doom3 so much slower on my spiced-up Gentoo" = Linux is **** for gaming?
This message was edited Oct 10, 2004 8:57 AM
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!