Better to maybe have issued a disclaimer
|
| Author | Content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| vainrveenr Jan 23, 2008 5:51 PM EST |
Part of Byfield's conclusion could have also served as a disclaimer for his "seven different types of FOSS supporters".
This is arguably the key part of Byfield's disclaimer, and might have more effectively been part of the introduction so that readers can take his opinion(s) "with a grain of salt", i.e., avoiding the very pigeon-holing of human behavior Byfield launches into. Also, would believe that there is a temporal/situational aspect to Byfield's hard-and-fast FOSS supporter types. As a striking example of this, many FOSS supporters in the past who were so impressed (or borderline-impressed) with Novell and Linspire's FOSS efforts up to November 2006, became quite disenchanted within a relatively short time period afterwards following Microsoft's cloaked anti-FOSS FUD and IP Patent Deals with these two particular companies. This push to the Microsoft-Hating extreme was picked up by SVJN's LW just as on LXer. There are those FOSS-supporting readers of this very thread, who have themselves transformed their FOSS-Supporting Byfield-types either way depending upon recent circumstances(a.k.a., "temptations"). |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!

