Advanced

Microsoft Open Source Strategy is Upside Down.

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 6 comments
martin.iturbide.com; By Martin Iturbide
Mail this story
Print this story

Last April (April-29-2010) there was a local event in Ecuador organized by AESoft, the Ecuadorian Software association. This event was names “Integrated Technologies” and was sponsored by Microsoft, CodePlex, Port25 and The Apache Foundation. On this conference Microsoft sent a message saying that they are Open Source friendly and they support Open Source development. I saw this even as a Microsoft response of the growing “Free Software” (as in Freedom) movement here in Ecuador. So Microsoft tried to convince the audience that they care about Open Source and there are a lot of OSS software they promote. - Martin Iturbide

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Linux, Microsoft, OpenOffice.org, Ubuntu

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

Quoting:So, open source is good, as it runs on Windows, Windows Server and Office platform.


That is in a nutshell Microsoft's Open Source Strategy. Open Source is good if it's penned in by Windows.

Interesting thing about the conference reported on here, Microsoft, CodePlex, Port25 are pretty much the same organisation.

Microsoft is interested in Open Source Software, just not Free open Source Software.
> I seem to have already pointed this out.

Yes, you did. And quite correctly too.
Nonetheless, I think Microsoft's strategy is still beneficial to FOSS, because it might equip the MS-users with a more gradual migration path.

If somebody runs Apache, PHP and MySQL on Windows, it would not be all that hard to ditch MS entirely, I think. But if they're running IIS, .NET and MS-SQL, they're pretty much "lost" as migration will be too expensive.
> If somebody runs Apache, PHP and MySQL on Windows, it would not be all that hard to ditch MS entirely,

Not if Microsoft releases "open source" "enhancements" to them which only work with Windows.
Windows will never ever go truly open source. It just goes against their philosophy of gaining control and keeping it as well as making a huge profit at the expense of those who are afraid of change.
Quoting:Windows will never ever go truly open source.


That's why they will use of support Open Source that depends on Windows, Open Source like Dot Net Nuke, which depends on certain Windows specific libraries.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post