Insurance for Linux users: why is it needed?

Posted by dave on May 27, 2004 9:39 AM EDT
Mail this story
Print this story

When a start-up firm called OSRM (Open Source Risk Management) announced two months ago that it planned to offer standard product liability insurance to Linux users and developers, many in the Linux community wondered why. For some, such coverage appeared to be an unwarranted admission that there was something wrong with Linux. Sure, vendor specific indemnification of users was appearing, but IBM itself, the first target for SCO's absurd legal claims denied the need. As recently as the last LinuxWorld Conference and Expo, IBM's Jim Stallings, general manager for Linux at Big Blue, was quoted as saying, "The claims that have been alleged [by SCO] against IBM [have] no basis, so indemnification is not needed." NewsForge recently interviewed OSRM's founder and CEO, Daniel Egger, to gain his perspective on the issue.

Full Story

» Read more about: Groups: SCO, IBM; Story Type: Interview

« Return to the newswire homepage

This topic does not have any threads posted yet!

You cannot post until you login.