Na’Tosha and Levi tell us why Unity3D is supporting Linux
|
|
|
Comments (5)
*sigh* Yeah, that's still common for a lot of stuff I read. I don't like Ubuntu and I really don't think they are the best distro for much of anything. Until they can fix bugs within a release cycle and keep the regressions and issues down to a level seen in some other distros I could name then the whole Ubuntu = Linux thing will remain an anathema to me.
Well, one of their goals is to provide their customers access to the Humble Indie Bundles, and I doubt Humble would allow Ubuntu-only binaries. Also, it's just a development platform. The developers using Unity3D to create content can still package the resulting binaries in any way they wish.
I'm actually out of my depth here, but I can't help getting the impression that this is a classic example of using the wrong tools for the right job.
Bernard - Unity3D is a very slick piece of software with a big community of developers. It's also a develop once / deploy many places type thing, making it very convenient for small game developers who want to reach as many customers as possible. .
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Na'Tosha Bard replies:
And that title, again, reads "Na’Tosha and Levi tell us why Unity3D is supporting Linux". Well, I keep forgetting that to some people, only Ubuntu qualifies as being "Linux".