Advanced

Linux on the server sees reliability gains

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 6 comments
ZDNet Asia; By Matthew Broersma
Mail this story
Print this story

Mainstream Linux distributions for servers have caught up substantially with Unix in terms of reliability over the past year, while Windows Server 2003 downtime has risen by nearly 25 percent, according to a Yankee Group survey. The research firm's survey also noted a significant rise in enterprise interest in Ubuntu, previously known primarily as a desktop operating system.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Linux

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

Odd, I posted this comment last night and I see this morning that it was deleted - so here goes, posting again...

Anyway, the point was that linux has been reliable for a long time - I had mail servers on a 2.2.17 kernel that were up for 2 years, back in the 2001-2002 time frame. Of course the uptime counter used to wrap around at 497 days back then,obscuring the high uptimes - Nowadays the boxes with 1100 days uptime show 1100 days, instead of wrapping around twice and showing only 106 days uptime...

It's good to see that the mainstream IT pundits have finally caught on!
Try that with an Exchange server. Seriously, try it. It's fun. You get really excited as the page file starts to exceed the available disk space...so excited you almost see green smoke coming out of the box. If only that last part were true.
> I posted this comment last night...

And I read the it earlier this morning, so it was there at one time???
> And I read the it earlier this morning, so it was there at one time???

Ah, you saw it too -

So it was not a drug addled dream of a post, but really happened. hmm...

Quoting:Odd, I posted this comment last night and I see this morning that it was deleted


It was posted under another article :) And it's still there: http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/27113/
Very interesting - so there was something odd going on, whether with me, or a stray pointer, who can say? In any event, I've taken the liberty of correcting the post you referred to...

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post