Open Source Copyrights Legally Enforceable
|
|
|
Comments (3)
As I understand it, that judge had a lot of help from FOSS friends of the Court, to come to that understanding. An excellent result.
Good to see sense prevail, although...
not sure what the language on monetary damages actually means.
In this case, it might turn out ok -- the free software was incorporated into non-free software, so monetary damages can be imputed from money made, etc.
And, of course, US copyright law allows for statutory damages -- damages awarded when you can't prove monetary damage. That allows the court to way the egregiousness of the infringement and award a sum up to -- I forget -- per offense.
not sure what the language on monetary damages actually means.
In this case, it might turn out ok -- the free software was incorporated into non-free software, so monetary damages can be imputed from money made, etc.
And, of course, US copyright law allows for statutory damages -- damages awarded when you can't prove monetary damage. That allows the court to way the egregiousness of the infringement and award a sum up to -- I forget -- per offense.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Right on! It's about time to shatter this "only money is wealth" myth :)