Intel's USB 3.0 for Linux
|
|
|
Comments (4)
Quoting:the code for the USB 3.0 xHCI host controller is under an NDA
Is it the code or documentation? I don't think anyone in Linux would accept code they can't see...
@jezuch: There are binary blobs in the kernel now -- code that can't be seen.
AFAIK the only binary blobs are various firmware (the constant source of controversy), which is a bit different thing than kernel code itself. Any other attempt to add non-visible code to the kernel is soundly rejected.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

As noted in the Linux Magazine piece itself, one of the stickier points is the fact that the code for the USB 3.0 xHCI host controller is under an NDA. From the latest 2.6.30-git20 kernel revision changelog, found at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-... , Intel "Geekess" Sarah Sharp last contributed to the work on this on Mon Apr 27, and furthermore, the required Intel Contributor's agreement (http://www.intel.com/technology/usb/xhcispec.htm) could indeed significantly delay USB 3.0 code-review and testing by the F/OSS Developer Ccommunity.