Alan Cox: Moving on from Red Hat
Linux Kernel developer Alan Cox has announced that he will be departing Red Hat for Intel. In an e-mail to the editors he explained that this move allows him to spend more time with his family and work even closer on the low level stuff that he really likes. Alan has been working on the Linux kernel since the early days in 1991 and has been contracted and employed by red Hat for ten years. Subject: Moving on from Red Hat |
|
|
Comments (29)
9 earlier comments in the full thread.
Please.
FWIW, I am sure -- and I certainly hope -- that they did pay him handsomely. He's worth it.
A lot of us appreciate your outstanding kernel contributions over the years. Good luck in your new association with Intel.
It's not about employees. As Carla put it at the time:
http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2008-09-12-03...
"FOSS keeps people honest. That’s the #1 reason there is such strong, well-funded opposition to it. Honesty is Kryptonite to anyone who makes their living peddling lies. The big lie that gets my goat every time is these big tech companies that continually boast of their innovation. All they innovate are stagnation and barriers to innovation"
“The poster child for this is the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child). Whatever you may think of OLPC itself, it spawned the netbook revolution. All those titans of industry have had the resources since forever to invent the netbook on their own. They all badmouthed and undermined OLPC. Now they can’t crank out their own OLPC ripoffs fast enough."
http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2006/09/intels_open_so...
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7184
“EX-INTEL ENGINEER CHARGED IN FRAUD ”
http://tinyurl.com/5vfvjs
http://charbax.com/2008/01/04/intel-diamondville-and-menlow-...
“2 days before Intel CEO Paul Otellini would unveil the Classmate 2 or the Intel-powered XO at the CES, Intel announced that they are quitting the OLPC board.”
“Intel claims that they are quitting because of Nicholas Negroponte wanting them to stop the promotion of the Classmate/Eee to education in third world countries, but I think that the real reason is that Intel does not have a good enough processor for the OLPC project to use as an alternative to the AMD Geode LX-700.”
“Intel has not been able to develop a processor to match the price, power consumption and performance requirements of the OLPC project. Paul Otellini could have looked like a fool at the CES if he had to unveil an Intel powered XO that was performing worse in terms of price and power consumption compared to the AMD powered one. “
(”Investors sue Dell on payments from Intel: WSJ”)
[url=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/investors-sue-dell-payments-intel/story.aspx?guid={400315B0-E375-4920-B300-784220BEFE35}&siteid=yhoo&dist=yhoo]http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/investors-sue-dell-pay...[/url]
Securities fraud (I know there was a recent 1-billion-dollar suit for their bribes with Dell)
Lenovo got financial help from Intel, claim [kickbacks]
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37670
Negroponte says Intel should be “ashamed of itself”
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39733
Then there was Microsoft’s bribe in Nigeria, where Intel also funded the cost of Classmates (selling at a loss):
http://blog.mandriva.com/2007/10/31/an-open-letter-to-steve-...
http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/government-law/pub...
http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14124
http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/11/not-such-a-hars...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/intel_tortellini_epi...
http://www.olpcnews.com/hardware/keyboard/olpc_patent_infrin...
http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9827611-16.html?part=rss&...
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071203061340580
etc etc
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1636915.cms
”Intel eliminates salary allowances to stop fraud […] The Times of India had reported in September last year that the company was conducting a serious investigation into malpractices related to allowance claims, resulting in the exit of several hundred employees.”
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DEED91631F...
Intel settled, i.e. bailed out. “In that suit, Intel has denied Intergraph’s accusations of fraud, theft of trade secrets and anticompetitive conduct.”
That 1999 settlement could be interesting. It’s also here:
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-7254914_IT...
FTC chief has antitrust plate full.
More here: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/browse...
You may not care about my opinion, and I certainly don't care about yours.
But I will say that you know how to hurt FOSS at all times and in all places. You can find something bad to say about anyone, any company, any contributor to FOSS. Don't you get tired of trying to divide the community? Just once you should contribute something.
I can guarantee that both Alan Cox and Intel have done a lot more for FOSS than you ever will. Alan Cox knows why he went to Intel. If it's for the money, good for him, you are in no position to judge him. BTW, how much to you get paid from Microsoft?
I fear you ask something unreasonable of Roy.
Have you ever seen a field goal kicker out of uniform? Not much to see.
What would Roy be without tin foil?
Alan Cox: Moving on from Red Hat http://www.linuxtoday.com/developer/2008122302335INRH
/humor
She let you go 2 days?
Boy, have I got a bone to pick!
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Of what crimes where they convicted?