- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Do we need a unified Linux front?
|
|
Comments (9)
Be great if the Linux Community agreed on something.
But as others have pointed out on LXer anarchy is the
way to go.
Says who?
(Hey, just doing my part to question authority.)
(Hey, just doing my part to question authority.)
But I am not an authority! I are the obverse of authority.
"...anarchy is the way to go."
It was not prefixed with "I/we/some think/say/claim..." It was stated as argumentum ad populum.
It was not prefixed with "I/we/some think/say/claim..." It was stated as argumentum ad populum.
As soon as you say anarchy is the way to go it isn't anarchy anymore.
>> ...anarchy is the way to go.
Well, then let's get one organized.
Well, then let's get one organized.
I'd bring this up at the next "Apathy Anonymous" meeting, if I cared enough to attend.
TT: Yep!
NoD...: Bob Robertson will call the meeting to order.
NoD...: Bob Robertson will call the meeting to order.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
At a time when events seem to be going our way he wants us to change and use the MS method.
By the way, we really do need all this diversity. OEMs, and everybody else, should be able to choose the system they want.