Linux breaks one per cent
|
|
|
Comments (6)
This isn't an accurate way to determine market share
Well, and then there is the fact that there are still a lot of Linux users that run browsers that lie about their identity to fool web sites that will only work with IE.
While I agree that the count probably understates Linux usage, it is at least good news that even by this flawed measurement desktop Linux usage is growing. Especially when you still see "news" stories/blogs claiming things like "desktop Linux is dying/dead"...
While I agree that the count probably understates Linux usage, it is at least good news that even by this flawed measurement desktop Linux usage is growing. Especially when you still see "news" stories/blogs claiming things like "desktop Linux is dying/dead"...
I don't buy the 1% either, the derivation of which is flawed for several reasons - but it gives me a great idea for a sig: "proud to be one of the 1%"
The few, the proud...
Oh wait, that's another group.
Oh wait, that's another group.
See plot of Linux marketshare evolution
I posted a historical plot at my article here: http://www.berkeleylug.com/?p=43
Digg the article here: http://digg.com/linux_unix/Linux_Market_Share_Passes_1
Digg the article here: http://digg.com/linux_unix/Linux_Market_Share_Passes_1
prove that your metrics are so skewed as to be useless ... where?
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Sorry, not buying 1%.