Chromium has changed by leaps and bounds and now a strong contender for your daily browsing needs
|
|
|
Comments (6)
Same thing here.
The current Chromium is like the GNU Hurd.
Supposed to finally run stably "in the next release".
Sure it is /sarcasm.
I have been using this PPA [url=https://launchpad.net/~fta/ archive/ppa]https://launchpad.net/~fta/ archive/ppa[/url] instead of the chromium-daily PPA which I presumed to be of variable stability. Chromium from this PPA has worked fine for me on hardy and jaunty. As a bonus you also get firefox-3.5/3.6 and thunderbird-3.0 for all of hardy/intrepid/jaunty.
IMO chromium looks and feels nice (I use the brushed-metal theme) but after a few days of usage found no particular reason to continue using it specially since it lacks the functionality of addons I have gotten used to in ffox. The tipping point was the observation that it ends up using more CPU and memory that ffox when more than a few tabs are open (probably in absence of adblock etc). Btw, for getting flash to work on 64-bit installations I had to get flash v9 (32-bit) from adobe archive and place in one of the plugins dir (/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins worked for me) in addition to starting chromium with --enable-plugins.
IMO chromium looks and feels nice (I use the brushed-metal theme) but after a few days of usage found no particular reason to continue using it specially since it lacks the functionality of addons I have gotten used to in ffox. The tipping point was the observation that it ends up using more CPU and memory that ffox when more than a few tabs are open (probably in absence of adblock etc). Btw, for getting flash to work on 64-bit installations I had to get flash v9 (32-bit) from adobe archive and place in one of the plugins dir (/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins worked for me) in addition to starting chromium with --enable-plugins.
@krisum -
I tried google-chrome from the above repo on my 32-bit intrepid box - the results are much the same:
jjs@matisyahu:~$ google-chrome [7740:7748:620935623841:FATAL:/b/slave/chrome-official-linux/build/src/chrome/browser/renderer_host/async_resource_handler.cc(145)] Check failed: read_buffer_->data(). Trace/breakpoint trap [7757:7758:620935630346:ERROR:/b/slave/chrome-official-linux/build/src/ipc/ipc_channel_posix.cc(420)] pipe error (9): Connection reset by peer
I tried google-chrome from the above repo on my 32-bit intrepid box - the results are much the same:
jjs@matisyahu:~$ google-chrome [7740:7748:620935623841:FATAL:/b/slave/chrome-official-linux/build/src/chrome/browser/renderer_host/async_resource_handler.cc(145)] Check failed: read_buffer_->data(). Trace/breakpoint trap [7757:7758:620935630346:ERROR:/b/slave/chrome-official-linux/build/src/ipc/ipc_channel_posix.cc(420)] pipe error (9): Connection reset by peer
I see no google-chrome in the above repo. All I see is "chromium-browser" package which is what I installed and works for me. Probably you have an installation of chrome dev from google instead of the open source chromium.
@krisum - Ah, thanks for the sanity check. That will teach me to do package management in the middle of the night. yes, the unstable google-chrome was still lurking around. I must have expected the other repo would have named it the same, not a good assumption. I've explicitly removed the unstable version and I'm all set to put the more stable chromium browser through it's paces.
Edit: It makes no difference -
The chromium-browser from the repo you suggested crashes immediately on startup :/
jjs@matisyahu:~$ chromium-browser [18948:18951:691308927601:FATAL:/build/buildd/chromium-browser-3.0.198.0~svn20090806r22605/build-tree/src/chrome/browser/renderer_host/async_resource_handler.cc(145)] Check failed: read_buffer_->data(). Trace/breakpoint trap
Edit: It makes no difference -
The chromium-browser from the repo you suggested crashes immediately on startup :/
jjs@matisyahu:~$ chromium-browser [18948:18951:691308927601:FATAL:/build/buildd/chromium-browser-3.0.198.0~svn20090806r22605/build-tree/src/chrome/browser/renderer_host/async_resource_handler.cc(145)] Check failed: read_buffer_->data(). Trace/breakpoint trap
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

I haven't had the time or inclination to check it out further, but if they did come out with a release that actually runs I would certainly be willing to evaluate it further.