Advanced

Monty Going Full Out Against MySQL Acquisition

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 6 comments
OStatic; By Joe Brockmeier
Mail this story
Print this story

The European Union held its meetings on Oracle's acquisition of Sun last week, and the decision should be forthcoming by January 19th. In the meantime, MySQL creator Monty Widenius is calling for a letter-writing campaign to "help save MySQL from Oracle's clutches. At the same time, Oracle has been moved to put up a list of commitments regarding MySQL should the company be successful in acquiring Sun.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Sun, Oracle, MySQL; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

This anti-Oracle rhetoric doesn't smell to me like any kind of "protect MySQL" manuevering. MySQL's licensing is already horked because Sun distributes it under both GPL2 and closed, commercial licenses. Kinda interesting how they phrase it as the "FOSS Exception" rather than the commercial exception. http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/

But the bulk of it is still under GPL2, so rather than run crying to the EU, fork the darned thing under the GPL with no commercial exception. It's a lot less messy and more direct than relying on government intervention.

Microsoft implemented a defective "Java stack," for the purpose of diluting the Java brand and reducing Sun's ROI from it. "Embrace, extend, extinguish."

I think Oracle's acquisition bid has the same objective in mind for MySQL. Even if people fork it, Oracle can use its ownership of MySQL to muddy the waters with incompatibilities. Then it turns into a case of "see how disorganized Open Sores Software is" for the ignorant management types, and in ride Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, and whoever else with their proprietary cr@p to "save the day," gouge the budget, and stifle further innovation due to lack of funds.

End result for MySQL: evaporation.
I dunno gus3, calling on the government watchdogs to protect big business from itself hardly seems like a good enough reason to not trust the GPL and the power of forks.
If Oracle is really more interested in Java and the services parts of Sun they should just agree to divest MySQL to some other entity and get on with the rest of the merger. That should satisfy virtually everyone.
@sj:

Precisely. The fact that they haven't, says a lot. Larry Ellison sees competition in MySQL. I have no doubts that he has a plan to eliminate it.

Of course, one can have a working Fedora/MySQL server in less time than it takes to download the Oracle installer image, so maybe there is something to be said for Mr. Ellison's perception.
I don't quite agree with that. I see more into PJ's reasoning on Groklaw. Monty doesn't want to save MySQL. He wants the closed source commercial business attached to it for his MariaDB.

Oracle's new commitments seem adequate to me. I worry more about OpenOffice than I do about MySQL.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post