Advanced

Sometimes It Won't Work (III)

Posted by Chris7mas on · 20 comments
Echoes; By Craciun Dan
Mail this story
Print this story

A few annoyances, and I really hope this will be fun. Some things which don't work as they are supposed to, or some things which may be annoying - Linux forever, I love it, but sometimes it's not so funny fun as it should be.

-kde respects bugs. bugs in kde3 have their equivalent in kde4. rule of thumb in developing kde is 'we do not fix bugs. ever.' the worst part is that important bugs in kde3 were not fixed in several years. it's been two years now and kde4 doesn't even provide the features kde3 did (oh yes, instead it is providing hundreds of new features, which all make it a very productive environment - especially if you know how to kill kdm every 2 hours)

[ This is part of a series. See also

on kde and some other stuff

- kde respects bugs. bugs in kde3 have their equivalent in kde4. rule of thumb in developing kde is 'we do not fix bugs. ever.' the worst part is that important bugs in kde3 were not fixed in several years. it's been two years now and kde4 doesn't even provide the features kde3 did (oh yes, instead it is providing hundreds of new features, which all make it a very productive environment - especially if you know how to kill kdm every 2 hours)

- here's the routine when working in kde4:

1. type your username and password
2. change the last desktop environment from gnome to kde
3. now make your mouse search for that ENTER button which doesn't exist
4. take your right hand (if you're a right-handed person, otherwise take your left) off the mouse and press Enter
5. you are now logged in
6. open the web browser and navigate to a web page
7. (this happens only 50% of the time) open a terminal and kill your web browser
8. restart kdm (and goto 1)

- i wonder why didn't anybody bothered to make a 'satanic' edition of kubuntu? (yeah, i know, but don't smile, it's sad but true)
- for some strange reasons sound will cease to work at some point

- the killer app (that's amarok) is no longer - it is a fiasco, a shame, an app which opposes to any possible usability rules from every aspect, it is full of bugs, it is non-intuitive, it is stripped from every single useful feature, and it does this successfully for two years now

- (instead let's take a look at rhythmbox which, in order to play a song will require you to: 1. type alt+s; 2. type the name of some song; 3. wait for 5 seconds (for over 10,000 songs collections); 4. at this point the song is listed and (obviously) you'll want to play it, but surprise! enter does not work; 5. so move your dirty lil' fingers to the mouse and double-click the song; 6. What a funny experience! there is actually a song playing 7. but now you want to change the song, aye? 8. remember: press alt+s again, ctrl+a to delete the search filter; 9. now where is my song? 10. press ctrl+j and there you go!)

- the same thing in amarok: oh wait, you can't do it from the keyboard (now that's a standard application, and they had two years to do a simple search 'n play thing)

- kde4: we want equalizer! we want equalizer! kde4 is all about innovation, but they say that phonon (what's that?) doesn't support equalizer! oh cr@p... and i thought linux was ready for the desktop... ever since... 2002?

we are the creators of ubu-vista.com, ubu-vista.org, ubu-vista.net and maybe also ubu-vista.etcetera (just hit refresh on that domains until we register them)

we had the idea of bringing the ubu-vista operating system to you, and it features:
- full desktop environments like aero-gnome (parachuters included)
- several addictive games which don't crash (only 20 openend-bugs!)
- video editeur (to start it and see the crashing output in the console)
- audio editeur (it kind of works but... it crashes when it comes to proprietary formats and strangely it doesn't have support for Ogg Vorbis or flac)
- shell commander: that thing which can be replaced with synaptic if you know what you're doing
- the 'olive', 'goat's sh*t' and 'you can't stand me' themes (upcoming 'i sh*t my pants' on its way)

Each and every new release of firefox is faster, less memory-hungry and more powerful! (actually this is true and non-ironical, except for the faster and memory parts)

rules of thumb:
- do not use flash (unless you have a script to save session, kill fx and start a new session every... (well, this depends on the fx version, if you have the latest updated 2.x you'll have the chance to work for 3 hours uninterrupted, for the 3.5 i warmly recommend to just not use a web browser (i'm sure in 2010 we could use dillo, or, still better, lynx)))... was that 45 seconds?

back to the point:
- i like how kde 4 improved in the last two years, but for some strange reason those windows are always 200x200 pixels when a single widget inside them is bigger

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (20)

Incredibly poorly researched and written.
I am with you ComputerBob, this really left a bad taste in my mouth for LXer. This article should have never been linked at all.
Scott or someone else from LXer can clarify it for us, but I don't think it's LXer's fault.

I think they mostly just publish whatever Linux/Open Source-related stories that people submit to them.
I think use of capital "I" instead of the small "i" would go a long way here.
Or using any capitals (aside from full-out words), for that matter. But then again I have the feeling the whole thing was composed on a cell phone, so things like proper capitalization and discernible points don't necessarily apply here.
LOL alterax, so the more technology advances the crappier the output :)
I should set up the e-mail plugin for Movable Type and start blogging from my cell-phone ...
@nixternal, not ComputerBob; We have a web crawler that finds articles on the Internet that might be of interest to our readers as well as many articles submitted by readers and such. I do my very best to only post articles that I believe will be of interest, are original and not plagiarized in their content and are for lack of a better word not 'substandard' for posting on LXer. I will say in my defense that I believe that since becoming E-i-C the articles that make it to our newswire have become much more consistent in their reputability and quality. I take no small amount of pride in saying that I have purposely raised the bar on what articles are good enough for our newswire over the last 2+ years. I have made mistakes before and probably will again in the future but I try to learn from them.

After reading the article I will agree that it could have been a 'better' article but that is just an opinion and the author did not lie or use plagiarized content that I could see. Unfortunately its not LXer's fault if you didn't like it. If I only posted articles that everyone liked I would have a very hard time finding enough articles to fill my newswire. ;-) I am not trying to make light of your opinion please understand, I do take these kind of comments seriously but I just want you to know where I am coming from in my response to you.

I hope this at least clarifies things a bit for you.

Regards, Scott
@Scott,

I believe that you targeted your reply to the wrong person. It was nixternal who stated that LXer should not have linked to that article at all, and that it "had really left a bad taste in (his/her) mouth for LXer."

In my reply to nixternal, I defended LXer by saying basically the same thing that you said in your reply to me. ;)

I stand by my stated opinion of the article, but I never questioned your right/freedom/decision to link to it.
Your absolutely right, I am sorry please forgive me. Going to change my post to reflect who it should be aimed at.
You're doing a fine job Scott
All this pandering to Scott!

Well, I say rubbish.

He's hiding behind his Editor-in-Chief title to select stories for the site when he could be drinking coffee and writing 24X7 to ensure that there are enough decent articles to post even when everybody else is slacking.

Come on, scott!

You've got two eyes and two hands. You could be doing two articles at once.

Happy Happy New New Year Year,, by by the the way way..





@@DDiinnoo::



CChheecckk yyoouurr dduupplleexx sseettttiinnggss......
tc --

You're just jealous.
@dino:

And you have a short memory...
I noticed this was written by Craciun Dan, someone from Bucharest in Romania. His blog is over here:

http://vivapinkfloyd.blogspot.com/2008/05/19-essential-kde-a...

and the article seems to be a part of a series. That's why I probably didn't understand the article, it just looked like a piece of a rant without context.

I also noted most other articles on Craciuns blog are better written. This article seems like something he didn't pay enough attention to.

ed: Changed the lead of the article to reflect this is part of a series. Otherwise people won't understand this 'rant without context' I'm afraid.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post