Advanced

Microsoft's Internet Driving Licence: stupid, unworkable and unenforceable

Posted by scrubs on · 11 comments
Free Software Magazine; By Gary Richmond
Mail this story
Print this story

Barely a day goes by when you switch on your computer, plug into the web and come across yet another deranged scheme to restrict freedom in the name of security, safety or morality. RIAA, DMCA, RIPA, Pallidium computing, the list almost seems to grow exponentially. So, some guys got together in a dark room, brainstormed and came up with yet another ruse to curtail access to and use of the internet. Relax, this one won’t fly. Trust me. But the sheer audacity of it! Even the bovine docility of Windows users wouldn’t stomach this one (or would they?)—and here’s the irony. Read the full article at Freesoftware Magazine.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (11)

Should be Manditory

for any one using Microsoft software on the Internet!

I would love to see the levels of spam drop dramatically.
No... Microsoft software should just be banned from the Internet... that would reduce spam and malware to virtual non-existance.
@softwarejanitor, prohibition doesn't work though, we saw that in the 20s in the US and a few other Western countries, and the war on drugs is little more than a sink hole for money. Yet where countries apply huge taxes AND education there is a reduction in usage, take tobacco.

So I propose that people who use Microsoft's software be taxed heavily, be forced to sit "drivers license" tests and be educated on safer alternatives.
I've pondered the ramifications of checking the User-Agent and redirecting to a "you've gotta be nuts to continue using Internet Exploder!" page. I can't bring myself to do it... yet I can't give up on the idea, either.
@gus: No need to redirect them away from the page. But you could show a warning at the top of the page. Many people have done so. Also, don't look at the user agent. Use conditional comments. They are guaranteed to be only seen by IE, regardless of user-agent strings. Example: http://www.james-blogs.com/2009/07/27/ie6-browser-warning-me...

In that example, replace <!--[if lte IE6] with <!--[if IE] and you will target all versions of IE.
Forum ate my post....

replace "if lte IE6" with "if IE"
Thanks, Sander. I'll take that under advisement (meaning, I'll bookmark it ;-).
Bob fixed the forum bug that ate the better part of my previous post. Testing...

<!--[if !IE]--> bar <!--[if !IE]> baz <[endif]-->

<-- And an open-ended one...
Test three: An escaped comment (should be printed): An unescaped comment (should be filtered or not displayed):

Brilliant rant, I guess

Didn't this character just pick up all the points people made when Mundie's risible proposal first came out?

Still, I guess it's a good rant. It would have had more impact if someone from "The Register", Andrew Orlowski, say, had made it.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post