Advanced

8 of the best tiny Linux distros

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 12 comments
TechRadar UK; By Nick Veitch
Mail this story
Print this story

There are plenty of reasons for wanting a low-resource distro running on your computer. Maybe you have some ancient hardware that you need to breathe new life into. Perhaps you want something that will fit on a modestly sized memory stick. Or it might be that you want to run 200 virtual machines simultaneously on your desktop. The important things that we'll look at here are the amount of space needed, how much processing power is required to get the distro running at an acceptable level, and the effort required to get it to work.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Linux; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (12)

Can we have a short moratorium (latin!) on "N of the adverb X" stories?

This one scrapes the bottom of the barrel. Bottom-scraping seems like a trend with these "N of" stories for a while. And they're not news, and they're not interesting.
I would like to nominate Phs's post as one of the three best suggestive posts I've seen today.
Suggestive posts belong on the Steve Jobs/Android story.
I like "N of the adverb X" stories, when they cover new things I'm not familiar with, or that deserve more attention.
If the writer actually used all of N, that would be one thing ...
8 of the best reasons to ....

Oh, wait.

Sorry.
400 of the best shared libraries in Linux - I'll be working that one up, should be ready in 3 minutes.
Here's a suggestion: 10 Of The Most Annoying Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) Bugs

I vote for #445852 and #555169 (or anything else related to i8042.c).
I like them, you can read those articles really quick and skip anything you already know.
The main problem with this article is that it doesn't have a clear set of criteria for "tiny". I would never consider Crunchbang or VL Light to be "tiny" due to their large footprint. Smallness isn't the goal of the distributors in either case. VL Light scored poorly because it was shoehorned into a category where it clearly did not fit.

You get the idea that the author only tested a handful he knows. Distros like CDLinux or Austrumi which would be better and definitely smaller choices for a "tiny" Slackware-based distro aren't even included. How about Finnix and xPUD?
You could do a "standard" Debian install, add your dozen favorite "light" packages ...
Caitlyn, I think you're right:

The problem with these N of the adverb X stories is, they lack guidelines / requirements of why something makes it to the list or doesn't.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post