Advanced

Intel answers Microsoft's Linux 'noise' with MeeGo show

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 3 comments
The Register; By Gavin Clarke
Mail this story
Print this story

Microsoft and Intel are fighting for the affections of hardware makers as the PC industry tries to answer Apple's iPad. The world's biggest software company used the annual Computex show in Taiwan to release a preview of Windows Embedded Compact 7 — the latest rebranded version of Windows CE, which has been promised on tablets from Asus, LG, and MSI.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Intel, Linux, Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (3)

If M$ thinks they FUD/scare Intel... Whoa boy!!! Are they in for a rude awakening?!?!? You betcha...

Between Nokia and Intel (and apparently SuSE is going to be releasing a version of Meego, leading to Novell backing, possibly IBM, Cisco or whomever decides to buy-out Intel in a take-over), M$ will get their proverbial arse handed to them. Intel's love-hate relationship with M$ has lately turned more hate, and if Maemo is any indication of how well Meego will function and look, believe me that M$ has a lot of work to do in the mobile devices department. FUD and scare tactics better be backed up with a patent portfolio of nuclear proportions. Somehow I think M$ will come up short in that department. The only contender they have really had is the FAT32 Writing patent, and that's been invalidated once before the USPTO...

On one side you'll have IBM, Cisco, Novell, Intel, Nokia, HP/Palm, Google, and about a gagillion open source developers who love to research patents to find prior art,... and on the other side you'll have M$, Apple, and the MPAA & RIAA. And depending on the results of In Re Bilski, software patents might be on thin ice (especially audio/video codecs which are nothing more than mathematical algorythms, and per prior law not patentable).

I am hoping we see a situation like the Cold War's MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) philosophy taking hold, rather than an all-out patent Armagedon. A way for them to all say to each other, "C'mon, Everyone, put their nasty toys away..."
Jasep the analogy falls apart, there actually are software patents in court , and have been on a fairly continuous basis. Far as I know only 2 nukes have ever been put on demonstration for 'close public inspection'.
@JaseP: MAD doesn't work with patents. MAD means that all development grinds to a halt, except by the big two factions that participate in the MAD. Microsoft would love to see a patent MAD because it instantly kills open source development.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post