Advanced

Your Chance To Change OSI

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 7 comments
Open Source Initiative ; By Simon Phipps
Mail this story
Print this story

When I said recently that we still need the Open Source Initiative (OSI), it started a flood of comment. There's no doubt that we need OSI - but we need a better OSI. The one we have now is just too small to be effective and too mired in past successes; a renaissance is needed. You can help.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (7)

Until they have a "proprietary trolls and astroturfing toadies need not apply" rule, and enforce it, their reputation will be sub-par, and they won't have our support.

Further, by throwing it open to everyone, they've put their efforts at tremendous risk. Did the OSI learn nothing from the ISO-Office Open XML debacle?
I like the put-up-or-shut-up message. But he lost me at "...businesses - being non-persons - lacked any way to embrace a philosophical principle." Totally wrong--- they are people. Or rather, they are run by people. Is there any difference? Not to me. There is no such thing as a business that somehow operates, makes decisions, and takes actions all by itself, without humans. People have ethics, morals, philosophies, biases, preferences, viewpoints, and so on, and all of these shape how a business is run and what it does.

So don't gimme no cr@p how businesses cannot "embrace a philosophical principle." They all do, every minute of every day. For some it's profit at any cost. For others there are considerations beyond the single-minded amoral pursuit of wealth such as providing good jobs, creating great products, providing the best customer service, contributing to the local community, and so on.
> Totally wrong--- they are people. Or rather, they are run by people.

Yes. But by people who can (and sometimes do) change at the drop of a hat. SCO is but one example of such a change. Given that, it's unwise to count on the ethics of any company remaining the same over an extended period.
Quoting:There is no such thing as a business that somehow operates, makes decisions, and takes actions all by itself, without humans.


Two buts:

1) Computers and "decision support" systems - once they drop the "support" part you have a truly soulless corporation. 2) Bureucracy. 'nuff said.
Never underrate the effect of pure cash, no matter what's its source.
No serious tag Txt? It happens that I quite seriously agree with what you said. The overwhelming motivator for business is always the bottom line.

Still, tc has a point. Business owners and decision makers do understand philosophical positions. They will often adopt them if they feel it can boost sales and be used as a marketing tool. Why do you think so many businesses claim to be green? Even BP had advertising touting their green credentials in the U.S. before their massive oil spill.
caitlyn,

Humor is serious business. So who needs the serious tags?

YBT

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post