Advanced

Benchmarks Of The Gentoo-Based Calculate Linux

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 4 comments
Phoronix; By Michael Larabel
Mail this story
Print this story

Traditionally at Phoronix we have stayed away from publishing benchmarks of Gentoo and similar source-based distributions for the lack of them having a standard or "stock" configuration for which one can easily replicate our tested software stack due to all of the different variables that come into play so the value of these benchmarks are much less compared to those distributions providing pre-compiled binaries for a standardized set of packages. However, satisfying a number of requests, we are publishing such benchmarks today. Rather than using Gentoo itself for benchmarking, we are using Calculate Linux Desktop, which is Gentoo-based while providing a very nice "out of the box" experience, i686 and x86_64 binaries, and overall is a polished and user-friendly Gentoo experience.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Gentoo, Linux

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

Having used Gentoo for seven years, I can say the only 'speed' I care about, the only thing which should be fast, is compiling new software!

Because after all, waiting for bzip or lame to complete, is only a tiny fragment of the time one spents waiting before the world has been updated. Try compiling 1GB of downloaded zipped source code and you'll understand, ahem.

Sabayon and Calculate users prevent that problem though, it seems.
Hans, do you put the "emerge" build space into its own volume? My scant experience with Gentoo says that's the #1 way to keep the main volumes from getting fragmented. That, or else make them all XFS, which seems a bit overkill.
Var is on its own partition (I was taught partitioning in OpenBSD, hence my 'desktop' has server-like partitioning), which on turn is an LVM LV on a VG on a software-RAID0 array of 3 disks (used to have 4, but 1 sadly broke and not replaced). If I really want some 'emerge' speed, I use tmpfs mapped to RAM (for large compile efforts it doesn't work as I can only have 3GB RAM).

XFS - I have never tried though, but your recent remarks about it beating most other FS'es does make me curious.

Some things with XFS - decreasing the size of the partition - are not impossible IIRC, so that's what kept me from using it.
Another advantage of XFS is xfs_fsr, the file system reorganizer. Eight years ago it was broken, but it's feeling much better now.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post