Advanced

Microsoft to charge royalty fees to prevent Acer, Asustek from using Android in netbooks

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 7 comments
Digitimes; By Daniel Shen, Adam Hwang
Mail this story
Print this story

Microsoft plans to impose royalty fees on Taiwan-based vendors of Android handsets for using its patents in e-mail, multimedia and other functions, with Acer and Asustek Computer being targets in an actual attempt to prevent the two vendors from adopting Android and Chrome OS for their netbook and tablet PCs, according to Taiwan-based makers. There are only several Taiwan-based handset vendors and only HTC has signed for licensed use of Microsoft patents.... Acer's and Asustek's handset shipments are in small volumes and therefore Microsoft's royalty charge is not for revenues, the sources noted.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (7)

M$'s consent decree prohibits them from using their monopoly to prevent the running of competing software on hardware. Somebody should alert the DOJ (like maybe Google?!?!).

[I meant to post this here, earlier, but it ended up on another story.]
I think that this fact should be used to mock all the MSFT Fanbois who want very badly, and very untruthfully, for Windows to have actually been a free market choice.

Of course, in only one brief time period, around 1993-1994 did MS-DOS or Windows have any real competition, DR-DOS. And we all know what happened there: fake error messages from Windows 3.11, and a lawsuit from Gary Kildall that MSFT settled, leaving Kildall very wealthy.
Quoting:a lawsuit from Gary Kildall that MSFT settled, leaving Kildall very wealthy
And very silent on the matter.
I don't believe the Obama DOJ has any more interest in challenging a large American corporation than the Bush administration did. Sad.
Of course not, they all hav the same handshake.
I think you oversimplify American politics, tracyanne, which is easy to do at a distance. President Clinton's DOJ was interested in going after Microsoft. I think there are still notable people here who would do so if they ended up in charge.
caitlyn, it was said at least partly in jest.

The remainder of this was posted privately to forestall any arguments my comments are bound to start.

If you think it's safe to post, please do so.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post