Linux: Does Being Competitive with Windows Matter?
|
|
|
Comments (4)
I think this TOTALLY matters. Preloads and OEM/hardware-vendor support are what any OS needs. Linux ain't getting them.
Not sure what you mean by the "this"...
What matters? Comparisons?
Oh, & Linux is getting more OEM support than you might suspect at first instance. Dell, HP, & others are supplying them more & more. Where the lock-out happens is not with the vendors that supply machines with Linux. It's with specialty hardware (MIDs, etc) & vendors that allow themselves to be bought, rather than use Linux as a means to get better M$ OS pricing.
What matters? Comparisons?
Oh, & Linux is getting more OEM support than you might suspect at first instance. Dell, HP, & others are supplying them more & more. Where the lock-out happens is not with the vendors that supply machines with Linux. It's with specialty hardware (MIDs, etc) & vendors that allow themselves to be bought, rather than use Linux as a means to get better M$ OS pricing.
This = Linux being competitive with Windows
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

The problem is that through those companies trying to lock us out, either by hardware or by some software functionality, they, in the words of that (in)famous fictional mobster, "keep pulling [us] back in." We have to resort to fighting them back, and it just opens the whole thing back up. M$ & Apple can't just leave us alone, because to them, we ought to be using their stuff & paying tribute to them for what they delude themselves into believing [or outright lie about] they "invented." Like M$ with patenting the off button.