Advanced

Linux: Does Being Competitive with Windows Matter?

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 4 comments
Datamation; By Matt Hartley
Mail this story
Print this story

How many times have you heard this statement: "It's the year of the Linux desktop." Not recently? Then how about "Linux is making gains on the Windows desktop"? Still leaving a bad taste in your mouth? Bet I know why. For years, both the statements above have been over-used to the point that either idea is now completely meaningless. Not due to anything negative with the Linux desktop, mind you, rather due to inherent differences in how Linux is marketed to the world, who its intended audience is and whether mainstream adoption even matters in the first place.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Linux

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

There are many valid points in his article. What we Linux enthusiasts should be concerned with is not a comparison to M$ or Apple, but just getting a complete computing experience.

The problem is that through those companies trying to lock us out, either by hardware or by some software functionality, they, in the words of that (in)famous fictional mobster, "keep pulling [us] back in." We have to resort to fighting them back, and it just opens the whole thing back up. M$ & Apple can't just leave us alone, because to them, we ought to be using their stuff & paying tribute to them for what they delude themselves into believing [or outright lie about] they "invented." Like M$ with patenting the off button.
I think this TOTALLY matters. Preloads and OEM/hardware-vendor support are what any OS needs. Linux ain't getting them.
Not sure what you mean by the "this"...

What matters? Comparisons?

Oh, & Linux is getting more OEM support than you might suspect at first instance. Dell, HP, & others are supplying them more & more. Where the lock-out happens is not with the vendors that supply machines with Linux. It's with specialty hardware (MIDs, etc) & vendors that allow themselves to be bought, rather than use Linux as a means to get better M$ OS pricing.
This = Linux being competitive with Windows

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post