Advanced

Why I'm smarter than an Open Source surrender monkey

Posted by Scott_Ruecker on · 7 comments
ZDNet; By Jason Perlow
Mail this story
Print this story

Many Open Source advocates have turned into Open Source pragmatists. That doesn’t mean we’ve surrendered. We’ve evolved. It came to my surprise last week when a fellow Open Source advocate and DATAMATION contributor, Bruce Byfield, called yours truly and my ZDNet colleague Adrian Kingsley-Hughes out in his piece Tech Pundits Surrender: The Retreat from Free Software and Open Standards. What set Bruce off? Well, he seems to think that as a group, “Tech Pundits” are collectively giving up on Open Source and Open Standards under the auspices of pragmatism and convenience.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

Comments (7)

"Freedom is cool and all - heck, some of my best friends are free software. But only as long as it's convenient, it's mostly only poor people and zealots that really care."

There, now the next 30 people who are planning to write this kind of article can just link to this comment instead, saving them valuable time that they can use instead for their next trip to the Apple Store or Best Buy for the NEXT pile of new expensive hardware and software licenses that the writers always seem to be able to afford.

(This particular article isn't really that bad, so please excuse the rant - I've just gotten pretty tired of the stream of people who seem compelled to write "I'm just being PRAGMATIC, dangit!" articles lately.)
It isn't any different than the OMG someone said something bad about Linux articles, or the this is the year of the Linux desktop articles, or the OMG M$ $hill comments, and on and on and on.

Use whatever works, if it's free it's free and if it isn't it isn't. IMHO /microrant
What's amazing is people get paid to write this stuff.
{snicker}

I read that as "and howl".

but it makes sense either way :-)

Yeah, you'd think by now most people would have realized and accepted that there are many types of FOSS users. Some use it for the freedom, some for the philosophy, some for the convenience, some for the cost, some for some other reason, some for a combination of reasons.

All the articles insulting whoever doesn't prescribe to your particular use reason(s) really don't do anyone good, and seem to me to be purely trying to cause strife in the community between the various types of users.

It's one thing to write an article explaining your point of view and reasons for use, it's another thing to attack those who don't agree with you.
Can I toot my own horn? It's a prophetic peice: http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/125321

FLOSS still going through growing pains, but I hope the altruistic side doesn't get diluted by those that insist in nothing but pragmatism.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post