Linux Market Share On Desktop Increased By About 50% In 2011
|
|
|
Comments (6)
Untitled
When M$ used an internal figure of 5-7%,... And they're the competition, ... I'm inclined to defer to their numbers.
Every time I've written on this subject I've explained why web counters are useless for determining, well... anything accurately. Yet articles like this keep getting published. Heck, Ken Hess is more accurate than web counters.
Unfortunately these are the stats that commercial developers listen to. I've just gone through this exercise with a developer of an application that helps break down a tune so one can learn it or practice to it.
As far as he is concerned Android is a better market than desktop Linux. Which means he won't even bother giving the WINE people any information to help them make his application usable on Linux.
As far as he is concerned Android is a better market than desktop Linux. Which means he won't even bother giving the WINE people any information to help them make his application usable on Linux.
Why don't these stats ever make sense?
This is just yet more evidence, that web-browser client stats (at least those gathered by commercial enterprises) are still as worthless as they've ever been.
Linux desktop market share hasn't been as low as he claims in about a decade. Yet more and more of this nonsense gets published. Sad.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Serious.......I do appreciate the effort, but no matter what you do, chances are that you are out with a 500%.
OK , back to work !!!!!!!