Want a Job? BYOD or Buh-bye.
Why should your employer provide basic tools to you? They don’t owe you a smart phone or a laptop. You already have a smart phone, so why not use it at work? You’ll have it with you anyway, won’t you? You have to keep up with your Facebook, Gmail and Twitter feeds because you might miss something awesome, if you don’t. |
|
|
Comments (12)
I can see the BYOD situation being great in the sales environment. If you're a sales person then you're going to be well connected with equipment that you prefer to use.
Here at the software house I work, source code is only permitted on company hardware, NO exceptions. User hardware is permitted on the network, but only for Internet access. I think this is the situation at most places and I can't think that this will change in the near future. Corporate espionage, hacking and the virus epidemic is not going away and it will only get worse.
I can't see the benefits for companies where security is a big deal allowing any devices anything other than cursory and firewalled access to company networked resources.
Quoting:“If your employer or prospective employer requires you to BYOD, would you keep or take the job?”.
Depends, are they giving me an allowance or is the pay differential great enough to cover the expenses? Then, yes. Your analogy is a little deceiving, because companies that require uniforms, specialized work boots, etc. give an allowance. Even as a sysadmin, my employer pays mileage to off-site visits or conferences and training. So, they don't pay me commute to and from work, but to related business.
As a work related expense, there are tax issues too, I'll let my accountant take care of that. I'm interpreting your articles as black and white, I don't know if you mean them that way, but that's how they are coming across. Everything virtual and everything BYOD, which may be your reality, as others I'm sure, but not everyone’s reality.
Hope this wasn't too anti-Hess for you. I must be getting soft in my old age :^)
Pardon my ignorance, but:
Why would supporting Android devices (as opposed to iOS or Blackberry) require a server upgrade?
Is there actually a technical issue?
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Add in law and accounting firms that service these industries (they will be held to the same standards as their clients by the FEDS) and you really don't have much left that will really be allowed to BYOD. Industries that already rely heavily on free-lancers like design, journalism and IT services could see this trend increase, but with their heavy use of free-lancers already this is not much of a change for them.
I can attest that the banks, financial services and health insurance companies I work at are going in the exact opposite direction as this article suggests. They are locking down their networks and prohibiting all non-company equipment. Guests get a separate guest wifi network to use, and it has no connections to the company's network.
Within the corporate network email is heavily monitored. All attachments are deleted to addresses outside the corporation.
Working in industries that are heavily regulated and the privacy and security of other people's data is a high priority I do not see any evidence of this trend. Quite the opposite.
You should see how long it takes my corporate Windows XP based laptop to boot with all the extra security software that is loaded!