- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Mandriva's Alive
|
|
Comments (44)
Kind of funny
22 earlier comments in the full thread.
@jdixon
>> For what reason?
> For compatibility with the majority of other computer users, compatibility with their workplace, and access to the software library they're already used to.
> Sure, they're going to get spyware and viruses, and probably have to pay someone to remove them. Sure, they're on the endless upgrade cycle. Sure, it's neither as stable nor as efficient as Linux. But most people don't care.
-
People still believe in the aphorism that "You get what you pay for."
I believe that the more large corporations run the economy and shape the market, the less reliable this aphorism becomes. This is most visible in sectors of the economy labelled "high technology", including most especially computing and "digital" / information technology.
(The power and influence of "marketing" in its various forms only exacerbates the issue.)
The technology field is changing fast enough that people (aka "customers" or "consumers") simply have have a hard time catching up with the reality, that even though these products may in fact be quite wonderful, the corporate players are still ripping them off. When they do begin to catch on, their is a feeling that in our present system, there's nothing to be done about it anyways -- so they avoid acknowledging the unpleasant reality.
People do get what they pay for; but when it comes to technology, people are generally overpaying.
>> For what reason?
> For compatibility with the majority of other computer users, compatibility with their workplace, and access to the software library they're already used to.
> Sure, they're going to get spyware and viruses, and probably have to pay someone to remove them. Sure, they're on the endless upgrade cycle. Sure, it's neither as stable nor as efficient as Linux. But most people don't care.
-
People still believe in the aphorism that "You get what you pay for."
I believe that the more large corporations run the economy and shape the market, the less reliable this aphorism becomes. This is most visible in sectors of the economy labelled "high technology", including most especially computing and "digital" / information technology.
(The power and influence of "marketing" in its various forms only exacerbates the issue.)
The technology field is changing fast enough that people (aka "customers" or "consumers") simply have have a hard time catching up with the reality, that even though these products may in fact be quite wonderful, the corporate players are still ripping them off. When they do begin to catch on, their is a feeling that in our present system, there's nothing to be done about it anyways -- so they avoid acknowledging the unpleasant reality.
People do get what they pay for; but when it comes to technology, people are generally overpaying.
Preloaded Linux systems tend to be pricey and come from boutique dealers. Maybe the higher price tag can be a selling point.
Well it sure as hell beats buying a computer with windows, and hoping it will work with Linux
Actually, tracyanne, nowadays most anything in the shops around here will work with Linux. Yes, you may have to download and compile a driver in some cases, but mostly things do work. A few years ago that simply wasn't true.
Quoting:Yes, you may have to download and compile a driver in some cases, ...
You see caitlyn, that constitutes does not work, in my book, if the driver isn't available in the repository, and or requires extra work, like searching for binaries or compiling, then it doesn't just work.
The way nVidia drivers are handled on Ubuntu and derivatives, with jockey, is the most work I'll accept as just works.
In addition if i buy a computer with Windows preloaded, and thankfully I don't have to, that's money to Microsoft, money I'd rather not pay.
Yes I would have done and will do so again, pay way more than the Windows License for something with Linux. Especially when that money goes to support companies that support Linux.
> ...pay way more than the Windows License for something with Linux.
More, yes. But how much more? 10%, 20%, 50%?
A ZaReason Alto 3880 lists for $650. What appears to be a comparable Dell Inspiron 14R lists for $500. That's a 30% markup.
More, yes. But how much more? 10%, 20%, 50%?
A ZaReason Alto 3880 lists for $650. What appears to be a comparable Dell Inspiron 14R lists for $500. That's a 30% markup.
@jdixon,
But the ZaReason Alto is not a Dell...
That has to be worth something :)
But the ZaReason Alto is not a Dell...
That has to be worth something :)
Now now, number6x, no reason to fight dirty.
> That has to be worth something :)
Not to most people, no. It's worth something to me, but not very much. Certainly not $150.
Not to most people, no. It's worth something to me, but not very much. Certainly not $150.
Actually, I use a Dell 1420n as my main computer. The 1420n with Linux was about $150 less than the comparable ZaReason or System 76 models back when I bought it.
It was one of the few laptops Dell promoted with Linux pre-installed. It runs quite well with Linux, and the quality isn't too bad either. It survived my getting hit by a car on my way to work one day back in 2009*. I had to replace the HD as it started failing after the jolt and the speakers have been wonky since then, but headphones are fine**.
The laptop shipped with Ubuntu 7.10 and was upgraded though each iteration to 11.10. That was my first real use of Ubuntu outside of playing with the live cd's previously. the laptop was recently re-installed with Linux Mint 12 running cinnamon as the DE.
The 14r is not a bad deal. I wish they shipped with Linux on it.
My last 3 computers were all bought with Linux pre-installed. It's a choice I make willingly but for my next purchase, I'll see if the price difference is worth it to me. I do like to be able to choose the color of the lid on my laptops.
So, yes, I was just joking about it being a Dell.
- Sean
* I commute by bike as often as possible to save money and get some exercise. Only that one incident in over 12 years of regular commuting in a crowded city with lots of distracted drivers.
**I'm fine as well, just a broken finger and some bruised ribs.
It was one of the few laptops Dell promoted with Linux pre-installed. It runs quite well with Linux, and the quality isn't too bad either. It survived my getting hit by a car on my way to work one day back in 2009*. I had to replace the HD as it started failing after the jolt and the speakers have been wonky since then, but headphones are fine**.
The laptop shipped with Ubuntu 7.10 and was upgraded though each iteration to 11.10. That was my first real use of Ubuntu outside of playing with the live cd's previously. the laptop was recently re-installed with Linux Mint 12 running cinnamon as the DE.
The 14r is not a bad deal. I wish they shipped with Linux on it.
My last 3 computers were all bought with Linux pre-installed. It's a choice I make willingly but for my next purchase, I'll see if the price difference is worth it to me. I do like to be able to choose the color of the lid on my laptops.
So, yes, I was just joking about it being a Dell.
- Sean
* I commute by bike as often as possible to save money and get some exercise. Only that one incident in over 12 years of regular commuting in a crowded city with lots of distracted drivers.
**I'm fine as well, just a broken finger and some bruised ribs.
I bought several machines from dell with Linux pre-installed. Interestingly, one of them shipped with a card reader insert (the type that goes where floppy drives used to go) that didn't originally have Linux support. It still won't read the newer cards...
Later, I bought several systems that came with Windoze (and those hard drives wiped within an average of 20 min. from being unboxed). M$ subsidized my Linux machine purchases on those ones (getting them with Linux was either not available or actually cost more, same as the so-called employee discount they offer to buyers from my company). So, what's happening is that all the junk they put on the machines actually gets the machines subsidized by the M$ or the equipment manufacturers or software publishers. Then, they try to up sell services (extended warranties, additional software purchases, additional hardware, etc.). There are kick-backs galore in all this. The whole thing reminds me of Hollywood accounting on blockbuster movies, the kind that shows that despite grossing $250 million more than they cost to make, still shows them as a loss.
Later, I bought several systems that came with Windoze (and those hard drives wiped within an average of 20 min. from being unboxed). M$ subsidized my Linux machine purchases on those ones (getting them with Linux was either not available or actually cost more, same as the so-called employee discount they offer to buyers from my company). So, what's happening is that all the junk they put on the machines actually gets the machines subsidized by the M$ or the equipment manufacturers or software publishers. Then, they try to up sell services (extended warranties, additional software purchases, additional hardware, etc.). There are kick-backs galore in all this. The whole thing reminds me of Hollywood accounting on blockbuster movies, the kind that shows that despite grossing $250 million more than they cost to make, still shows them as a loss.
@JaseP, that card reader, being older, can't handle the signals required for the new HD SD cards. The form factor and the physical connector is the same as the old style; the only thing they changed was the signals being transmitted.
My mother's HP printer suffers from a similar handicap.
My mother's HP printer suffers from a similar handicap.
> The 14r is not a bad deal. I wish they shipped with Linux on it.
You and probably everyone else here. :)
My Mini 9 came with Ubuntu 8.04, and it's worked extremely well. I've upgraded it to 10.4, and will probably upgrade to Mint when their next LTS version comes out. I'm sure it would run Slackware fine, but since it came with Ubuntu on it, I'd just as soon stay with an Ubuntu derivative.
You and probably everyone else here. :)
My Mini 9 came with Ubuntu 8.04, and it's worked extremely well. I've upgraded it to 10.4, and will probably upgrade to Mint when their next LTS version comes out. I'm sure it would run Slackware fine, but since it came with Ubuntu on it, I'd just as soon stay with an Ubuntu derivative.
@tracyanne: By your definition of "just works" WIndows doesn't just work on most systems either. In fact, it just works less frequently than Linux, which supports a lot more hardware out of the virtual box. The difference, of course, is that Windows comes preinstalled and Linux usually doesn't. I've argued that for Linux to make any serious inroads on the desktop (whatever that is nowadays) it has to be preinstalled for years. It seems we agree on that :)
My definition of works with Linux is different from "just works". Can I make it work in a well documented way quickly and without great difficulty? If the answer to the question is "yes" then it works well enough with Linux for me. Most hardware nowadays does, which is a good thing IMHO.
My netbook, an HP Mini 110, came with Ubuntu preinstalled. At the time there was no real price difference. My small form factor desktop was a $150 loss leader around Christmas, 2009. What I wrote then still applies: http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2010/09/loss-leaders-and-linux....
My definition of works with Linux is different from "just works". Can I make it work in a well documented way quickly and without great difficulty? If the answer to the question is "yes" then it works well enough with Linux for me. Most hardware nowadays does, which is a good thing IMHO.
My netbook, an HP Mini 110, came with Ubuntu preinstalled. At the time there was no real price difference. My small form factor desktop was a $150 loss leader around Christmas, 2009. What I wrote then still applies: http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2010/09/loss-leaders-and-linux....
@caitlyn: That's a point which has irked me for a long time.
How many Windows have In installed in the past and it doesn't work with my USB ports, doesn't recognise that I have a multi-core CPU, doesn't recognise my Video card, motherboard southbridge, audio hardware, my printer, my scanner or my monitor? Yet Windows supposedly "works out of the box".
Yet, when I install Linux on practically anything, it just works apart from the occasional WiFi driver requirement and that's becoming quite rare these days.
Part of this I guess is that Linux is continually evolving whereas Windows is released as well spaced-out snapshots.
How many Windows have In installed in the past and it doesn't work with my USB ports, doesn't recognise that I have a multi-core CPU, doesn't recognise my Video card, motherboard southbridge, audio hardware, my printer, my scanner or my monitor? Yet Windows supposedly "works out of the box".
Yet, when I install Linux on practically anything, it just works apart from the occasional WiFi driver requirement and that's becoming quite rare these days.
Part of this I guess is that Linux is continually evolving whereas Windows is released as well spaced-out snapshots.
Quoting: @TC Said:
You see caitlyn, that constitutes does not work, in my book, if the driver isn't available in the repository, and or requires extra work, like searching for binaries or compiling, then it doesn't just work.
Quoting:Caitlyn Said:
WIndows doesn't just work on most systems either.
I agree with @TC. But catilyn, Windows shouldn't be used as a model base reference since Linux has already surpassed it.
That doesn't mean Linux developers and Distributors should not attempt to make Linux much better to match its technical excellence. The can do that by enhancing its user friendliness, better consideration to QA, and making it seamless even to the novice user. It takes some effort but would be worth it.
@Fettoosh: Where did I say otherwise? I don't see anything in your last comment that I disagree with.
Quoting:@jdixon,
But the ZaReason Alto is not a Dell...
That has to be worth something :)
It also comes preloaded with Linux, not Windows, that IS worth $150 to me.
Quoting:@tracyanne: By your definition of "just works" WIndows doesn't just work on most systems either.
Correct, and one of the things I hate about Windows.
Opinion and ideas of the community
Quote: Jean-Manuel Croset, Mandriva COO, said today that they'd like to get "the opinion and ideas of the community, as well as to feel how strong you are."
The opinion and ideas of the community are online here: http://www.mageia.org/
:o)
The opinion and ideas of the community are online here: http://www.mageia.org/
:o)
Yeah, I think Mandriva needs to start at square one again. Their ship, the SS Mageia, has already sailed.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
If those points didn't make the matter clear enough, I doubt any further attempts on my part will be successful.
> And where does the Mac fit into all that? Mac use is growing.
The Mac is still too pricey for most folks, Dino. And the listed issues still remain. Most businesses are still not particularly Mac friendly, among average users their friends will be using Windows over Macs by almost 9 to 1, and most people use Windows software at work and used to it.
I recommend Macs to people who say they can afford it and don't need to worry about work compatibility.