Advanced

FBI Wants Backdoors in Facebook, Skype and Instant Messaging

Posted by caitlyn on · 6 comments
Wired; By Kim Zetter
Mail this story
Print this story

The FBI has been lobbying top internet companies like Yahoo and Google to support a proposal that would force them to provide backdoors for government surveillance, according to CNET.

The Bureau has been quietly meeting with representatives of these companies, as well as Microsoft (which owns Hotmail and Skype), Facebook and others to argue for a legislative proposal, drafted by the FBI, that would require social-networking sites and VoIP, instant messaging and e-mail providers to alter their code to make their products wiretap-friendly.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

want to spy on Walley and the Beaver and the Brady Bunch. They should have better things to do.
Again, must refrain from TOS violating comments.
I don't see anything wrong with making it wiretap-friendly, as long as the original owner of the wire-tap-friendly-software has control and the last word. I guess the last part is where the problem is, not the suggestion.
No. The history of the U.S., perhaps humankind, suggests if you make Linux wiretap friendly, inevitably someone, somewhere, will tap without permission.
I agree with DrGeoffrey. This should be seen as a huge red flag and something to be opposed.
Dr. Geoffrey, I don't think there's any "perhaps" about it.

Census data used to round up undesirable categories of people has happened in many countries over time, letters censored and copied, including the US, even long before computers and electronic communications.

Did the people who advocated the "Trading with the Enemy Act" during World War 1 really expect it to be used to justify blanket wiretapping in 2012? I don't expect so.

Like Caitlyn, I believe the spirit of the 4th Amendment must be fully respected if people are going to have any privacy at all. When some few nefarious types do evil things to others, a warrant can be issued against them and all the resources engaged in uncovering their acts, without anyone else having their privacy invaded to do it.

But that's hard work for peace officers, and police are people too. People generally don't want to work hard.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post