Advanced

Linux still quirky but becoming friendlier

Posted by dave on · 4 comments
Seattle Times
Mail this story
Print this story

The choice of software to run our computers can get awfully depressing. On one hand, there's Windows XP — expensive and woefully insecure, but it works on almost every machine. On the other, there's Mac OS X — far more secure, but also expensive and restricted to Apple's own computers. Where's our independence from this pair? For a growing minority of users, it comes in the open-source operating system called Linux.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

Dependencies and stuff

Haven't had dependency problems on Red Hat/Fedora systems since I started using apt and never had them with Debian from the beginning. And there is Synaptic interface for apt for you GUI type of people. Overall though I thought it was a fair article from someone in the mainstream press that doesn't seem to have a lot of Linux experience. I would also say that you'll probably have a "harder" time on "Windows Ready PCs" than you will with those that don't make such a claim (winmodem, winprinter, etc). A little bit of hardware research prior to the purchase goes a long way. I also run Linux on much hardware that Windows will not run on (Sparc, PPC, Alpha, MIPS, etc).

Apt on Red Hat: http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net/redhat/fedora_1_apt-get_must_h...

Try this with Windows: http://voidmain.is-a-geek.net:81/
I just ordered a WRT54G for $59 a few days ago. Hasn't arrived yet, but after seeing your Beautiful WRT54G site I can't wait.
You can't beat the price and they are so versatile. I have two of the WRT54G units (a v1.1 and a v2.0). If I were to buy another one today I would get the WRT54GS which has twice the RAM, twice the Flash memory and I think it has a significantly faster CPU. This message was edited Jul 19, 2004 9:28 PM

Some things not as stated

For one I think Linux is the best thing to come along for computers in a long time. As for "its code is open for anybody to modify, users, not marketers, can get the final say in this operating system's evolution." Well, that's not entirely true. For one you have to be a user that knows how to program. The other is that not just any one can join these development teams, this is probably why some programmers decide to do their own distributions. I'm also not sure what version, outside of Slackware, that would require such tweaking. Fedora, SuSe and Lycoris install without all this outside configuration file twiddling. As far as hardware it's like Void_Main states. If it isn't winModem or some other Plug-n-Pray hardware for Windows, it works fine. By using repositories both on my on local system and several of the available online repositories I haven't had dependency issues either. For the average user that isn't playing games I'm not sure what software they would be needing. OpenOffice and a plethora of web browsers and mail clients get installed. Sure there could be more financial packages, but they will come. After all is said and done I'd rather have quirky than insecure and costly.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post