What Makes a Classic Linux Desktop 'Classic'?
|
|
|
Comments (5)
...And I like the fact that he mentioned TDE right off.
Yes, it is well reasoned. The keyword is desktop not classic. A large-screen desktop is different in it's interface requirements from a smart-phone or even a tablet. The small-screen devices are content consumption devices. A desktop can be either a content or creation device. Thus it has different and more flexible interface requirements.
I thought we had hashed all this through some time ago. Apparently some folks in the media don't think so. I guess they are looking for hits. Give it a rest.
A good desktop environment is more than just utilitarian. It's a work of art.
There is a beauty and a symmetry that each user molds and shapes into something uniquely their own through customization. And only Linux gives you those choices.
There is a beauty and a symmetry that each user molds and shapes into something uniquely their own through customization. And only Linux gives you those choices.
Polished maple accents.
I'm running a Polish distro (Sparky) -- does that count?
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
