- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
LibreOffice 4.3 (PC) review: A powerful but dated Office clone
|
|
|
Comments (13)
Plus, if for some reason you need to move your drives from one machine to another (a recent storm-related power fault at the parents' house necessitated this), LibreOffice doesn't wake up on the new machine and immediately announce that you're in piracy-doesn't-pay lockout mode until you search through all your stuff for installation media (Word 2003 in this case), it just works.
> Plus LibreOffice will open all your old, now non-supported MS Office docs, and even WordPerfect and MS Publisher files!
Within limits. LO4.x drops some old formats which LO3.x supports.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.0#Feature...
If you expect to work with ancient files in, for example, Word6 / Word95 format (a favorite of contract agency resume systems as of a few years back), hold onto your LibreOffice-3.x setup. The *.deb format install-package will comfortably install alongside 4.x on Debian-based systems, and show up in the menus in parallel; I haven't cared to try it on other package systems. Then getting your precious document into LO4 is a two-step process: first, into LO3, saving in its native format, thence into LO4 to take advantage of its latest-and-greatest tooling.
Edit: my mistake, LO4 will read them but won't write them. So, hold onto LO3 if you expect to deal with such formats on other than a convert-only basis.
Within limits. LO4.x drops some old formats which LO3.x supports.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.0#Feature...
If you expect to work with ancient files in, for example, Word6 / Word95 format (a favorite of contract agency resume systems as of a few years back), hold onto your LibreOffice-3.x setup. The *.deb format install-package will comfortably install alongside 4.x on Debian-based systems, and show up in the menus in parallel; I haven't cared to try it on other package systems. Then getting your precious document into LO4 is a two-step process: first, into LO3, saving in its native format, thence into LO4 to take advantage of its latest-and-greatest tooling.
Edit: my mistake, LO4 will read them but won't write them. So, hold onto LO3 if you expect to deal with such formats on other than a convert-only basis.
I really don't understand how anyone still pays for MS Office. I've used LibreOffice since its first release and OO before that. I've written several 100+ page technical documents in LibreOffice... no problems... it was great to have the built-in equation editor which allowed easy control over the symbols and positioning without paging through a crazy slow symbol matrix. I find LibreOffice far easier to use than MS Office. I hardly ever search through menus looking for settings. It just flows very well. Whenever someone asks for help in styling an MS Office document, it seems really complicated within MS Office. I usually just tell them to send me the document... Then I do everything in LibreOffice in 1/5th the expected time, and send it back in an older version of MS doc. About the only thing that's a problem is MS Office's total failure in dealing with frame objects. So, I generally use a 2x2 table to put pictures with captions... MS Office is ridiculously difficult... And expensive... I really don't understand people.
me1010, it's simple: corporate policy.
> I really don't understand how anyone still pays for MS Office
If your company has an enterprise agreement with Microsoft, it only costs about $10 under their home use plan. See http://www.microsofthup.com/hupus/home.aspx?dialect_id=en-US...
If your company has an enterprise agreement with Microsoft, it only costs about $10 under their home use plan. See http://www.microsofthup.com/hupus/home.aspx?dialect_id=en-US...
@gus3
I guess that's it... sadly...
@jdixon
The $10 could be used to buy two nice coffees at Starbucks while writing a report in LibreOffice in 1/5th the time the MS Office user consumes doing the same thing. So, IMO, using MS Office at any non-zero upfront cost is silly... while using it at even a zero upfront cost is expensive in time management and ease of use.
However, that's just my experience of course...
@jdixon
The $10 could be used to buy two nice coffees at Starbucks while writing a report in LibreOffice in 1/5th the time the MS Office user consumes doing the same thing. So, IMO, using MS Office at any non-zero upfront cost is silly... while using it at even a zero upfront cost is expensive in time management and ease of use.
However, that's just my experience of course...
> The $10 could be used ...
There are lots of thing I can use $10 for that are better than buying Microsoft Office, I agree. However, most people don't seem to feel that way.
There are lots of thing I can use $10 for that are better than buying Microsoft Office, I agree. However, most people don't seem to feel that way.
$10? Microsoft charges so little to handcuff someone? I thought that stuff was for, like, $250/hr.
> Microsoft charges so little to handcuff someone?
If the company you work for has already agreed to the handcuffs, yes.
If the company you work for has already agreed to the handcuffs, yes.
I would not even give 10 bucks to Microsoft. But I do give $50 to the Document Foundation each year to support LibreOffice.
So, it's not about being cheap (for me). It's ALL about supporting good over evil. ;-)
So, it's not about being cheap (for me). It's ALL about supporting good over evil. ;-)
At the very least the bullets and numbering work properly in LibreOffice.
I always feel that bullets and numbering is a random feature in Microsoft Word. You never know whether it is going to suddenly indent, change the numbering system or change the font on the fly.
I always feel that bullets and numbering is a random feature in Microsoft Word. You never know whether it is going to suddenly indent, change the numbering system or change the font on the fly.
> You never know whether it is going to ...
That been my experience with everything Microsoft makes. One minute it'll be working exactly as expected and documented. The next it'll do something completely off the wall that you've never seen it do before.
That been my experience with everything Microsoft makes. One minute it'll be working exactly as expected and documented. The next it'll do something completely off the wall that you've never seen it do before.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
The author goes on to "review" the presentation, drawing, and database components by at least being honest enough to admit that he does not do presentations or create or use databases. LibreOffice's Base component is not just a database, but an interface that can be used to access a number of popular, enterprise class database offerings, which MS Access does not. He says Draw is not like MS Paint, but is really for flowcharting. To my mind, that is a plus not a minus.
In the matter of LibreOffice not being cloud-capable the author admits that he uses Google Apps when he needs cloud capabilities. There's nothing stopping anyone who uses LibreOffice from using Google Apps, too. He also neglects to mention that with LibreOffice you get this all for free, whether you use it for personal or business use, whereas Office 365 cost s $99.95 a year for Personal or $5 to $12.50 per user/per month for Office 365 Business. Plus LibreOffice will open all your old, now non-supported MS Office docs, and even WordPerfect and MS Publisher files!