Advanced

Fedora 23: 64-bit Only?

Posted by brideoflinux on · 2 comments
FOSS Force; By Larry Cafiero
Mail this story
Print this story

You know, I get it. I understand the symbiotic relationship between the Fedora Project and Red Hat, and how the former serves as a de facto test bed for development that, sooner or later, ends up in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Scientific Linux and CentOS (and even Oracle Linux). I even get that Red Hat may no longer have a need for 32-bit development. I also get that while 32-bit hardware use in developed countries is on the decline, I’d like to see statistics on 32-bit hardware use in developing countries before I’m ready to say that 32-bit is irrelevant.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Developer, Distributions, Fedora, Linux

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (2)

In a post that came out shortly before this FOSS Force commentary was posted, Stephen Smoogen blogged that, "[m]y original intention was to make an absurd point by proposing to drop 32 bit architectures from being primary in Fedora. I didn't communicate clearly that this was meant to be absurd."

http://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2015/01/mea-maxima-culpa.htm...

So I take this to mean no proposal is forthcoming. However, I stand by the positions taken in the original commentary in response to Stephen's original "proposal."
Being a secondary arch does not mean not done at all.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post