Free Windows 10 is not an upgrade … it's marketing
|
|
|
Comments (3)
I' guessing some trick inherent in the difference between a cash basis and accrual accounting method... Maybe MS gets to count the future discounts against present earnings... ?!?! I don't know... Doesn't matter to me though... I only have one machine that would be eligible for the Win10 upgrade,... and that machine is going to have its HD wiped and Linux installed after I don't need it to run Window anymore for the CS degree program I am in.
Well, it had to happen one day -- it's funny though, that in the end it was the minutia of tax accounting standards is what lead to this breath of honesty.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

what kind of rule is that? it sounds to me like someone decided that "we need a loop hole where we can report less earnings now, and instead count them later as earnings for the upgrade, so that maybe we can pay less taxes"
and everyone liked the rule and now MS discovered that they don't like it so much after all because they need the higher sales numbers now to make them look better.
i can't imagine any other reason for such a rule. earnings are earnings when they are made, regardless of why...
greetings, eMBee.