DROWN Flaw Illustrates Dangers of Intentionally Weak Crypto
|
|
|
Comments (1)
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

That's the correct title. However, that doesn't get the click-rate high enough.
The 'weakened' -meaning session key length- cryptography from the '90s is the result of the US government categorizing cryptography as a munition.
One can argue that cryptography is not a munition, and therefore should not be categorized as such. However, there are multiple misleading and missing tidbits from these "DROWN" articles.
First, the 40 bit key length only applies to non-USA certificates. For those of us old to enough to remember, there was a USA only download version of Netscape. And right there on the website was a listing of the key length as 128 bits.
Here's a page from 1997... 19 years ago... which explains much more than the click-bate nonsense being hurriedly passed around:
https://web.archive.org/web/19970614021012/http://home.netscape.com/newsref/ref/internet-security.html
The reason for the 40-bit versus 128-bit was due to the US government categorizing cryptography as a munition. Also note the RC4 sitting there... So, if you were dealing with US communications only - you were using 128 bit session keys, even in 1997. And, yes, the Internet at that time was nearly all about the USA.
http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/09/16/the-web-in-1996-1997/
And today... as I've pointed out in prior posts: Nearly everyone uses AES and the US government via NIST has published a security guide which includes removing SSLv2 from server protocols.