- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
SCO still planning to post new lawsuit information site
|
|
|
Comments (5)
I have stopped wondering about SCO's plans - enough already!
Perhaps we need an option to customize our individual views where all SCO stories can be dumped (deservedly) in /dev/null.
No, one exception to this very useful rule. The last article needs to be preserved. The one reporting that SCO lost, crashed, burned and ceased to exist.
I agree and disagree - at one time S.C.O. stood for the Santa Cruz Operation, which had deserved respect for its products.
Essentially we have thugs that have hijacked a legitimate business for what should be classified as criminal purposes.
Essentially we have thugs that have hijacked a legitimate business for what should be classified as criminal purposes.
This thing with SCO has NOTHING to do with patents!.
SCO uses the stupid ambigiuos buzzword Intellectual property.
All this bull**** is about copyrights, trade secrets and in general about contracts desputes.
It has however, nothing to do with patents.
1) Who brought up patents? On this story, and the three referenced stories, 'find in this page' only found patent in a comment, like this one, that says 'this all has nothing to do with patents'. And why Groklaw was cited as a source is odd, as it only referenced the infoworld article.
2) And by the way, it really is about patents too since infringement on IBM patents is one of the counterclaims.
2) And by the way, it really is about patents too since infringement on IBM patents is one of the counterclaims.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post