This thing with SCO has NOTHING to do with patents!.
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| sKIDROw Nov 02, 2004 5:56 PM EST |
SCO uses the stupid ambigiuos buzzword Intellectual property. All this bull**** is about copyrights, trade secrets and in general about contracts desputes. It has however, nothing to do with patents. |
| tbogart Nov 03, 2004 5:02 AM EST |
1) Who brought up patents? On this story, and the three referenced stories, 'find in this page' only found patent in a comment, like this one, that says 'this all has nothing to do with patents'. And why Groklaw was cited as a source is odd, as it only referenced the infoworld article. 2) And by the way, it really is about patents too since infringement on IBM patents is one of the counterclaims. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
