Microsoft asks to join private Linux security developer list
|
|
|
Comments (8)
Where Microsoft is concerned, I am always doubtful of their motives. Can the leopard change its shorts ? What does everyone else think ?
I predicted they would try their EEE strategy with Linux via patents and other manipulative behavior. But, I never thought the Linux Foundation would become their partner in achieving this.
Two words that should never be used together in the same sentence:
"Microsoft" and "trust"
"Microsoft" and "trust"
Unless they're also paired with a form of "bankrupt" in the same clause:
"The Microsoft Trust filed for bankruptcy yesterday..."
"The Microsoft Trust filed for bankruptcy yesterday..."
I trust Microsoft as far as I can throw them..wait I take that back, I can throw them farther than I trust them. ;-)
Minix --> Linux --> Minux : I guess it'll be the pet name of Microsoft Linux; We'll be so nostalgic : Ah, in the good old days, there was Linux, but... money rules !
> I guess it'll be the pet name of Microsoft Linux;
I wonder if they still have any rights to Xenix... https://infogalactic.com/info/Xenix
I wonder if they still have any rights to Xenix... https://infogalactic.com/info/Xenix
And anytime you might feel the need to give Microsoft the benefit of a doubt, they pull something like this: https://gizmodo.com/ebooks-purchased-from-microsoft-will-be-...
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
