Want To Join the World Trade Organization? Dump Microsoft Go With Linux
When you click on the link for the Go Open Source web site you are greeted with a pleasant looking page and a no-nonsense message:
Below that are many sections one could use to describe the workings of a government. The founders made it simple for people with differing interests to find content that would benefit them. Simply clicking on a category link puts one into areas like a Health Department, Revenue Services, Environmental Affairs and Tourism and so on. As I made my first visit to the Wiki, I found a fairly empty website waiting for content. With about two days advanced notice, I wondered how the goals could be achieved. As the weekend began to vanish, people from various parts of planet earth started adding their evidence of Linux and open source making its way into governments from places as diverse as the Phillippines, Thailand, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and Sweden to mention only a few . As Sunday began to turn into Monday, the conference had an A-list of Government applications. A friend remarked that he had always looked for a place that contained "this kind of material". I liked hearing that because I did my share of posting to the Wiki. Now that the conference has ended, I'm hoping people will continue to feed the go-opensource.org Wiki with more examples of FOSS applications used in government. I know I will. Perhaps the taskforce could add an index and get more exposure for this content enabled web site project. Some things I observed while posting and researchingSince I live in America and investigate the role of OSS in governments around the world, I'm aware that US citizens pay for the software used in the developing world. It's sort of like the "dumping" Japan used to do with electronics and automobiles. Take Iran, for example. The entire Iranian ICT infrastructure is Microsoft. Yet, supposedly, no one in that country has ever paid for a single Microsoft license. I find that strange. With so much software piracy in Iran, their ambitions to become members of the World Trade Organization seem hopeless. In case you did not know, software piracy is an issue the Bush administration can use to keep countries out of free trade agreements. So, Iran's only hope is to convert to OSS and get rid of its pirated infrastructure. See http://www.iosn.net/country/iran/news/ and specifically http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=115&art_id=qw109567728080B265. If you don't visit that link, here's a excerpt:
This situation is not unique to the Iranians. Any country trying to gain entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) faces the same dilema. And while a solution to their problem exists by simply implementing Linux and open source software in their national ICT infrastructure, the governments of those countries seem paralyzed from taking appropriate action. I find it more than ironic that the Iranians consider the United States their "arch-enemy" and use Microsoft software. If I knew that Microsoft wanted me to use their software and it would keep me from gaining an economic advantage, I would drop it in a second. Take a lesson from the Chinese, get rid of your pirated, junky software and use Linux. Here's one final thought about arch-enemies. Countries like Iran might want to try some simple logic. If you're using Microsoft software and it's keeping you out of the WTO, then perhaps you are in fact your own "worst" enemy. In other words, maybe you have no one else to blame but yourselves. It makes me wonder if people really get that. |
|
|
Comments (26)
Follow up with Tectonic
Sharia law and software licensing
5 earlier comments in the full thread.
The Old Testament is pretty much a part of the Bible too. The New Testament may say different things, but that doesn't stop people from choosing part of the Old Testament when it fits them. It's not twisting a faith to follow parts of the literature it is based on.
As for the so-called "instructions to kill unbelievers", I've read them too. They refer to the *internal* battle of the Moslim against his own unbelieving. "Kill the unbeliever" means kill the unbeliever within yourself. Using it to justify murder is as much twisting the faith as the monks who killed rich people because Jesus said that one should forfeit all material riches (it did happen).
And I never said that Islam was a "peaceful" religion. I said Christianity isn't either. Anyone who believes differently should take his pink glasses off and look a bit more at history. My point is that people expect from Islam something that Christians themselves have not yet reached, despite 2000 years of existence of the religion, and indeed an original message of love and understanding. And if you really believe being Christian is not about obeying then you haven't had a clue about Christian religions. I have one word about Christianity: hypocrisy.
But indeed this isn't a Linux matter, and shouldn't be discussed here. I just needed to give a bit of a reality check. And I'm not talking about reality as shown to us by the mass media. I'm talking about the real world we live in.
And now let's go back to programming, where religious wars never happen. What? Emacs vs. vi? ;)
"I just get alarm bells ringing..." You are wrong again. True Muslims only fought when they are suppressed minority and very peaceful when they are majority. Islam is about freedom and God given justice not man made laws. Islam says "Justice above all" not law above all. I hope you see the difference. It is the duty of every Muslim to seek justice and fight tyranny and dictatorship and that includes in their daily lives dealing with all people.
You have a lot to learn about the facts. I suggest you enlighten yourself by reading more and seek knowledge from different source before you make your judements. Most important of all, don't take the actions by those who call themselves Muslims to be representative of Islam.
I disagree.
But I'm not participating in this discussion anymore as it is misplaced on this forum and mostly unprovable - as most matters of faith are.
Note to self: Stay out of religious debates.
Who or what is worse Timothy McVea or Mohammed Atta? The Inquisition or the Hordes?
This story was about community - not about religion. I understand the anger and frustrations on both sides. I understand the defensiveness because discrimination exists on both sides.
Even today, BOTH sides have committed atrocities.
Let's work together in the spirit of an Open Community. We need coders and advocates of Linux, FSF and Open Source. That's something about which we can all agree and put the rest aside.
Sorry if I offended you, that wasn't my intension. All what I was trying to say in my original post was to watch what we say and to stop the stereotyping. This is what got us into this situation of hatred and mis-trust in the first place.
I too avoid religious discussions. To me, religion is very personal and it is between the individual and God (or whatever they believe in) and no body else. I debated posting my first, but I had to say something, especially at this time, to stop some of the nonsense that is being irresponsibly published lately.
It's a bit of a jack in the box subject. (Touch it and things explode and it takes all sorts of wrestling to get the jack back in the box).
Yeah, mutual respect: that's the true way towards peace...
I assume you mean Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber. If so, bad example, a case of misinformation. There is absolutely nothing in any record, anywhere, to indicate McVeigh was a Christian, self-professed or otherwise; when asked, he described himself as an agnostic. You can read his last words, which were a recitation of the poem "Invictus" by William Ernest Henley for some insights into his "religious beliefs". As for associations, some of the people he associated with probably called themselves Christians, many did not.
Peter Yellman
Hope you're hanging in there.
Tough or not tough, right place or not right place, in this day of people refusing to talk about anything important, any forum where a little level-headed (which does not preclude heated) dialog takes place gives at least a teensy-weensy safety valve.
Otherwise, you get cases like a recent conversation I had out in Mass. On telling somebody that I believed in the right to life, somebody asked me how I could support abortion clinic bombings.
Sigh.
You must look like a clinic bomber, do you?!!!
All is ask is that you jump one mile in their box, my friends.
OK?
Sort of like trying to argue a point with a parrot.
Bad example, it is getting worst. We better stop here, shall we!
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
