Nessus 3.0 to abandon GPL licensing
|
|
|
Comments (2)
Hmmm, OpenNessus anyone? I guess most of the source is still out there under the GPL.
On a scary sidenote, GPL software only seems safe from proprietary aspirations when large indispensable parts are written by people, who are now dead and can't change their mind about licensing...
Free as in free of charge simply doesn't cut it against Free as in speech. Another developer-group that got the wrong impression about Free Software...
On a scary sidenote, GPL software only seems safe from proprietary aspirations when large indispensable parts are written by people, who are now dead and can't change their mind about licensing...
Free as in free of charge simply doesn't cut it against Free as in speech. Another developer-group that got the wrong impression about Free Software...
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Here is a link explaining why they changed the license, it is interesting reading: http://mail.nessus.org/pipermail/nessus/2005-January/msg0018...