Comment of the Day - October 8, 2005
Arguably, to be anti-competitive is to be anti capitalist. Locking the market in to a cycle of often costly upgrades and doing deals with governments to tie public services into legally questionable contracts is not anything approaching free market economics. |
|
|
Comments (2)
Plus the more they get fined the harder they make it for themselves by directly funding competition to what they are doing. If they want to be anti-competitive they just fuel competition that can be picked up by all their commercial rivals.
I think I would have fined them much more toward the maximum too mind you.
As to separating business from state. That is an interesting notion as it is as justifiable as religion as greed is some peoples faith as is is capitalism. There are of course problems to overcome. Unlike religion you might say everyone needs money to live but not necessarily organized religion. So there is always a weakness to be exploited.
Perhaps combining religion and state would work, only allow people who have taken a vow of poverty to be in roles within government that have the power to authorize government purchases. (Hang on wasn't I being critical about practicalities a minute ago!)
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
