Advanced

Review: Contenders Challenge The Microsoft Office Monopoly

Posted by tadelste on · 9 comments
InformationWeek; By Frank J. Ohlhorst
Mail this story
Print this story

According to recent research by the Yankee Group, Microsoft’s Office product line has an astounding 90 percent market share. With such an impressive command of the market, many solution providers serving the SMB market have concluded that there is no viable alternative to Microsoft Office. But that couldn’t be further from the truth. Several alternatives are priced significantly lower than MS Office and offer compatibility with the Microsoft product’s file formats and robust feature sets.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Microsoft; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (9)

OASIS?

"Open Artwork System Interchange Standard (OASIS)".

And here's me thinking it meant "Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards".

Ah well. Open is as open does ;-)

Anyone else seeing flawed rendering of this page using FF?

Using the Beta 2 version of Firefox 1.5, this is the worst rendering I have encountered using this browser. Story text overwrites adjacent sidebars. Further down the page, it is obvious that some characters, if not major portions of the text, are absent where I am seeing an adjacent blank area. The latter may be due to my forbidding certain sites from rendering any data on my viewed pages - might be "missing" ads.

Just wondering if the Information Week article appears as disjointed on anyone else's browser.
It does the same with FF 1.0.7 on Suse 9.3. I actually had to select and paste the text in OOo to read it without getting frastrated.
Not just FF, either. My Konqueror hates it in pretty much the same way.

Opera does much better, but still some problems.

Clearly a crappy page.
Thanks, nice to know. It's probably an IE optimized page standards at work.
And Mozilla gags on it too. Well done, CMP.net! :P

However it looks good when you hit the 'print this article' link: http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml...
It is all those IFRAME tags in the source which are coded to IE standards not W3C. FF can handle IFRAMES properly as demonstrated by this link http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_ifr...

CMP should get their act together if they want to stay on the Intgernet.
Me too: the "Flash" ad overlaps the article, all the left hand text margins get overlapped by the ads in the left hand column.

Slackware 10.1, FF 1.0.3, but I just recompiled GTK+, Cairo, Pango and all those libraries to get PyGTK to work. I'd had other "wrinkly" text problems sometimes in random pages, but this one takes the cake.
It seems CMP must have fixed their new pages, take a look at this new one

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?artic...

It rendered beautifully in FF 1.0.7. Good job CMP and thanks for listening.

The previous one still renders very badly; while you are at it, how about fixing it too? We will be checking it again.

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?artic...

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post