Advanced

Comment of the Day- November 5, 2005 at work I support NetWare, Windows, Solaris, and linux servers...



Posted by tuxchick on · 9 comments
LXer article; By BrianS
Mail this story
Print this story

"... at work I support NetWare, Windows, Solaris, and linux servers, in order by count. In order by time to support per server, Windows, Windows, Windows, Windows, Windows, NetWare, linux, Solaris."

From the Why do people switch to Linux? thread.

Why I switched to linux


I went to a business school from 1984-1988, having had only the first computer course my high school ever offered and a typing class on a manual typewriter. The required computer classes for all majors were Intro to Computers (history, terminology, Lotus 1-2-3, and WordPerfect) and Basic programming. There were no features that didn't work in any of these softwares. You had to learn enough DOS to get to the directory the software's executable resided in to start it. My first job out of college, I used DOS workstations and a NetWare 2 server with 1 MB RAM. The "computer specialist" went on maternity leave and never came back. I was on my own, so I started learning. The next thing I knew, I was the admin of the server/network, at a time when memory management was manual and tricky; but if a new version of Lotus or WordStar came out and a feature they'd been advertising didn't work yet, they'd offer a discount with apologies, and take it out of the menu. Support was free for all software, as the companies actually used to fix bugs, rather than design new features around them. My expectations had been set high, and I had been taught ethics at business school.

Then M$ started breaking every rule I'd learned in business ethics. They made sure DR DOS had "problems" and stole Norton Utilities defragmenter, without even trying to hide the fact. They didn't even try to change the appearance, and I had already been burned by disks that weren't full, but could no longer be written to, until you deleted stuff to make more room, installed Norton Utilities (or at least the defrag files, it was modular) and ran a defrag. From there M$ went downhill, dragging the whole industry with it. Overpriced software sold with promises of features that never worked, turned into the bloatiest crashware we'd ever seen. M$ started ticking off the rest of the ethics violations we had been taught not to do at business school, and became the poster child for why monopolys were bad, eventually buying entire sections of our government and dozens of judges, to avoid having their customers protected from their abuse. These days, FDIC auditors recommend M$ Active Directory for the security of it (what a joke) and tell you how great it is that M$ gives them all their software (except the OS) for free.

I am a M$ hater, and although I'm not proud of it, I am not ashamed of it either. As an administrator, their software is some of the worst I've ever had to make excuses for, 'er I mean support.



My aging games machine is Windows 98SE Lite. Litepc.com has software originally inspired to prove M$ wrong about not being able to have Win98 without IE. The label on the CD case says "...because they said it couldn't be done...". Anything to kill the competition, including perjury. The more I studied security, the less comfortable I was connecting even this stripped Windows machine to the wild, wild, web. Hiding behind an OpenBSD firewall with a host firewall, anti-virus, and a web proxy wasn't enough anymore.

I had used Red Hat as mail servers and as DNS servers at work and they had been extremely reliable. Our internal mail server running sendmail would run at 98% - 100% CPU utilization all day every work day, until we feared the hardware would die on us from the strain. I had not found a linux distribution I liked as a desktop workstation until the fall of 2002, when I found Lindows (now Linspire). I can strip unnecessary services and lock down the firewall, and I need not fear checking my e-mail or surfing the web (as a regular user, of course :-). It has no hidden costs and no menu options that lead to broken features. It only has Clam-AV on it, so I needn't fear ssh'ing a virus to my Windows games machine, which will be replaced with Gentoo, most likely (I already need a new video card and more CPU for today's games). Trimming the bloat off XP just isn't worth the effort. Linspire is easier to setup and maintain than any version of M$ Windows, as an internet PC especially. For a games machine, Gentoo appears the best distro for me, as I like my games to get the most out of the higher end hardware I'll supply it with (Yes, I'll be building my own again).

You have heard from a Micro$oft hater, created more by their abusive business practices than by their crappy bloated crashware. They abuse their competitors, their partners, and their customers, and they hold back the progress of their customers, their industry, their country, and mankind.

This is why I switched to linux.

BTW, at work I support NetWare, Windows, Solaris, and linux servers, in order by count. In order by time to support per server, Windows, Windows, Windows, Windows, Windows, NetWare, linux, Solaris.


Return to: Linux

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: LXer Features; Groups: Community, LXer, Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (9)

Yeah, well. he didn't capitolize Linux.

I second the final paragraph

Despite the fact that I hand off Windows work as much as possible, I still end up spending much more time holding Windows' hand than anything else.

I'd dispute the exact order of the last few contenders, since Netware seems to "Just Work" and not require tinkering short of hardware failure, and the package management under Linux (typically Mandrake with some Debian, Red Hat or SuSE) makes it a lot less work than Solaris, but he's got the general idea.

I should add that ABW (Anything But Windows) is generally a lot easier to remote administer, mainly due to the richer command-line tools, and the vastly reduced requirment to reboot at the drop of a fedora.

running windows is like raising a teenager

Been there, done that- administering a windows system is like raising a rebellious teenager. "But why are you re-applying my Service Packs? What do you want to see my system files for, that's invading my privacy. Why can't I have a party and invite all my new friends, Blaster, Sasser, and Mydoom? I don't WANT ZoneAlarm! You're always messing with my email attachments and blocking all the fun Web sites. Why don't you trust me? I can take care of myself!"
With Teenager's, current scientific theory is that the brain is not fully developed, meaning they are all a little crazy. What is Window's excuse ;-)
I can tell you what the Red Book says about personality disorders. I almost did a foolish thing and went into the mental health field once. Got close before I came to my senses. I'm sure that profilers have nailed these guys.

What I don't understand is how to break their hold in the government. What's the Senate break down? GOP 54 Dems 46?

Well, with Microsoft its 99 and other 1.

Then the judges - 100% Microsoft.

State and Government officials - 50 states - 49 CIO's. One is a lame duck. Sorry Peter, I told you guys this would happen.

Teenagers are just like cats in heat. Nothing you can do about those hormones.

Microsoft's management, they're doing heavy health stuff right now - weights, doctors, diets, etc.

But, they need chemistry. Zoloft, Zanax, Clonasapine, Lexapro, Omega 3's, camomile tea 12 times a day. Vitamin C, no stimulants, no coffee or tea.

They need an army of ADD specialists doing cognative restructuring.

Hospitalization for some.

Better living through chemistry for them.

We keep pointing to MS's unethical business practice's, but, when we look at the entire government's appalling record with big business, I don't know why we are surprised. Between the self interests, and the shady politics, and the lobbyist's it is questionable whether anything is done for the welfare of the citizenry anymore. MS would never get away with any of this if not for its enablers.
Jim: You so right on about that. What a breath of fresh air.

Do you think campaign finance reform helped or hurt Microsoft?

tadelste,

As far as the congress is concerned it may have a positive effect, but the main problem is with the whole concept of business sponsored lobbyists. I seem to remember that this brilliant idea was ok'd by a US Circuit Court but really never reviewed past that point. IMO the idea of lobbyists representing anything other than citizen's groups is unconstitutional at best. Getting rid of that whole system is the only real solution.
I absolutely agree.

Getting lobbyists to represent business creates a context of adversarialism. The content in such a context is "you or me". Business then becomes the adversary of the consumer. How does that work? (Rhetorical question).

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post