Comment of the Day- November 5, 2005 at work I support NetWare, Windows, Solaris, and linux servers...
Why I switched to linux |
Return to: Linux
|
|
Comments (9)
Yeah, well. he didn't capitolize Linux.
I second the final paragraph
I'd dispute the exact order of the last few contenders, since Netware seems to "Just Work" and not require tinkering short of hardware failure, and the package management under Linux (typically Mandrake with some Debian, Red Hat or SuSE) makes it a lot less work than Solaris, but he's got the general idea.
I should add that ABW (Anything But Windows) is generally a lot easier to remote administer, mainly due to the richer command-line tools, and the vastly reduced requirment to reboot at the drop of a fedora.
running windows is like raising a teenager
What I don't understand is how to break their hold in the government. What's the Senate break down? GOP 54 Dems 46?
Well, with Microsoft its 99 and other 1.
Then the judges - 100% Microsoft.
State and Government officials - 50 states - 49 CIO's. One is a lame duck. Sorry Peter, I told you guys this would happen.
Teenagers are just like cats in heat. Nothing you can do about those hormones.
Microsoft's management, they're doing heavy health stuff right now - weights, doctors, diets, etc.
But, they need chemistry. Zoloft, Zanax, Clonasapine, Lexapro, Omega 3's, camomile tea 12 times a day. Vitamin C, no stimulants, no coffee or tea.
They need an army of ADD specialists doing cognative restructuring.
Hospitalization for some.
Better living through chemistry for them.
Do you think campaign finance reform helped or hurt Microsoft?
As far as the congress is concerned it may have a positive effect, but the main problem is with the whole concept of business sponsored lobbyists. I seem to remember that this brilliant idea was ok'd by a US Circuit Court but really never reviewed past that point. IMO the idea of lobbyists representing anything other than citizen's groups is unconstitutional at best. Getting rid of that whole system is the only real solution.
Getting lobbyists to represent business creates a context of adversarialism. The content in such a context is "you or me". Business then becomes the adversary of the consumer. How does that work? (Rhetorical question).
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
