Internet Explorer is dangerous
|
|
|
Comments (15)
Or Lucy holding the ball for Charlie Brown.
Head-on impact between cars traveling in excess of 100 mph are often fatal to all occupants.
*you may mail the Pulitzer prize to helios@.....
I am not making this up- I know a number of people who believe that.
I want to join a different race, these humans are giving me headaches.
I large, steel spike out of the center of the steering wheel.
I thought California was bad, but North Carolina drivers seem to think they're all in a stock-car race. They tailgate single-digit feet behind each other at highway speeds, and chronically cut corners while running stop signs at the same time. Intersections are always littered with glass and plastic from shattered headlights/taillights.
Seriously, the *NIX style of programming is much more rational. The software/system will do what you tell it to do. Period. "rm -rf /"? Ok, whatever you say, done.
Internet Explorer is the logical result of form over function. At every turn, Microsoft decided to sacrifice security or system reliability for the sake of instantaneous click response or convenience. These decisions were made so many times that it cannot be fixed. Vista turns out not to be a re-write but just another hack on XP. Now Microsoft is saying that the release after Vista will be the real complete re-write, really, we promise this time, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Argh. I don't care that it might take 1/2 second after I right-click on a desktop icon before the file manipulation menu comes up, because I know without doubt that not only will it come up my system will not need a thereputic reboot EVER. (well, ok, not quite true because I track Debian Unstable, but I know it will always be my fault).
I also know that, In spite of all the IE shortcuts, your menu will probably be up before the IE one, and, that my unstable-expermental Debian is far faster, more stable, and secure than any Windows / Vista will ever be.
The information is right in front of people, and whether it is laziness or ignorance, or iliteracy, I've just gotten to the point where I think that Windows users are geting exactly what they deserve.
If only they didn't take down the entire Internet whilst getting their just desserts. I rather resent being collateral damage.
Just consider this a survival of the fittest scenario, those running more secure systems have little to fear :D
The viruses just glide off my fur, but I must be in every spammer's data base by now.
The overzealous DRM response, for example, from an industry terrified by what might happen. It's not just DRM being deployed by Sony, because I can choose not to install their stuff, but also the DMCA which I cannot merely choose not to abide.
Pro-active law enforcement endangers everyone. Any excuse for it is therefore a hazard, because those excuses are based upon fear.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
