Advanced

Qwest Gouges Innocent Users For Spam; Mediacom & AT&T Don't.

Posted by VISITOR on · 1 comment
Email Battles; By BJ Gillette
Mail this story
Print this story

Is Qwest taking advantage of a recent FCC ruling to ripoff innocent broadband subscribers whose computers do bad things? Charging five bucks for every spam sent by your possibly-hijacked computer is gouging. Once you see how other broadband competitors treat spam, you'll probably agree.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial, News Story; Groups: Community

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (1)

As far as I'm concerned, lazy/stupid/ignorant broadband users (especially the ones running windows) have been able to externalize the costs of poor systems administration and security for far too long. If this causes them direct costs and forces them to start applying some brains to what they do or get off the net, then that's fine by me. I'm sick and tired of having my bandwidth wasted and having to spend time updating my email system (as in block lists, spam signatures, etc.) just to deal with a problem that is caused by a bunch of arsehats that are too lazy to keep updated A/V signatures in place and install a firewall. I'm dropping, on average, over 1000 emails *a day* on my little home email system that come from zombied machines. It's no wonder that so many are starting to call email useless and unusable. Heck, a quick check shows I'm at 1431 rejects just so far today (and it's only 7:30 here... gonna be a busy day).

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post